National Academies Report Released: Assessing Risks to Endangered and Threatened Species from Pesticides
Recently, the National Academies Press (NAP) released a report produced by the Committee on Ecological Risk Assessment Under FIFRA and ESA; Board on
Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Division on Earth and Life Studies; and the National Research Council titled, Assessing Risks to Endangered and Threatened Species from Pesticides (2013). The 176-page prepublication report (available free with a one-time registration) discusses how,
[t]he US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) are responsible for protecting species that are listed as
endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and for
protecting habitats that are critical for their survival. The US Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for registering or reregistering
pesticides under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
and must ensure that pesticide use does not cause any unreasonable adverse
effects on the environment, which is interpreted to include listed species and
their critical habitats. The agencies have developed their own approaches to
evaluating environmental risk, and their approaches differ because their legal
mandates, responsibilities, institutional cultures, and expertise differ. Over
the years, the agencies have tried to resolve their differences but have been
unsuccessful in reaching a consensus regarding their assessment approaches.
As a result, FWS, NMFS, EPA, and the US Department of Agriculture asked the
National Research Council (NRC) to examine scientific and technical issues
related to determining risks posed to listed species by pesticides.
Specifically, the NRC was asked to evaluate methods for identifying the best
scientific data available; to evaluate approaches for developing modeling
assumptions; to identify authoritative geospatial information that might be used
in risk assessments; to review approaches for characterizing sublethal,
indirect, and cumulative effects; to assess the scientific information available
for estimating effects of mixtures and inert ingredients; and to consider the
use of uncertainty factors to account for gaps in data. Assessing Risks to
Endangered and Threatened Species from Pesticides, which was prepared by
the NRC Committee on Ecological Risk Assessment under FIFRA and ESA, is the
response to that request.
No comments:
Post a Comment