Bressman, Lisa Schultz and Robert B. Thompson. The future of agency independence. 63 Vand. L. Rev. 599-672 (2010).
Goering, J. Lyn Entrikin. Tailoring deference to variety with a wink and a nod to Chevron: the Roberts Court and the amorphous doctrine of judicial review of agency interpretations of law. 36 J. Legis. 18-90 (2010).
Rubenstein, David S. “Relative checks”: towards optimal control of administrative power. 51 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2169-2241 (2010).
Linnekin, Baylen J. The “California effect” & the future of American food: how California’s growing crackdown on food & agriculture harms the state & the nation. 13 Chapman L. Rev. 357-389 (2010).
Pasquinelli, Sara N. One false move: the history of organic agriculture and consequences of non-compliance with the governing laws and regulations. 3 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 365-393 (2010).
Powers, Melissa. King Corn: will the Renewable Fuel Standard eventually end corn ethanol’s reign? 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 667-708 (2010).
Rolleri, Jacqueline S. Comment. Offshore wind energy in the United States: regulations, recommendations, and Rhode Island. 15 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 217-247 (2010).
Gibbons, Holly Anne. Incorporating animal law into private practice. 16 Animal L. 207-211 (2010).
Haupt, Claudia E. The nature and effects of constitutional state objectives: assessing the German Basic Law’s animal protection clause. 16 Animal L. 213-257 (2010).
Huss, Rebecca J. Why context matters: defining service animals under federal law. 37 Pepp. L. Rev. 1163-1216 (2010).
Lewis, Melissa. The regulation of kosher slaughter in the United States: how to supplement religious law so as to ensure the humane treatment of animals. 16 Animal L. 259-285 (2010).
McGinnis, Robin C., Legislative Review Editor and students Jennifer O’Brien and Randall Szabo. 2009 legislative review. 16 Animal L. 371-401 (2010).
Schoenbaechler, Danny. Note. Autism, schools, and service animals: what must and should be done. 39 J.L. & Educ. 455-464 (2010).
Hamzah, B.A. Malaysia and the Southern Ocean: revisiting the question of Antarctica. 41 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 186-195 (2010).
Kraska, James. From pariah to partner—Russian-American security cooperation in the Arctic Ocean. 16 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 517-534 (2010).
Mendez, Tessa. 2008-2009 Leonard V.B. Sutton Award. Thin ice, shifting geopolitics: the legal implications of Arctic ice melt. 38 Denv. J. Intl’l L. & Pol’y 527-547 (2010).
Lehavi, Amnon. Is law unbounded? Property rights and control of social groupings. (Reviewing Lee Anne Fennell, The Unbounded Home: Property Values Beyond Property Lines.) 35 Law & Soc. Inquiry 517-546 (2010).
Magnus, Jon-Erik W. Comment. Lyon’s roar, then a whimper: the demise of broad arranger liability in the Ninth Circuit after the Supreme Court’s decision in ... (Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United States, 129 S. Ct. 1870, 2009.) 3 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 427-457 (2010).
CLEAN WATER ACT.
Latham, Mark A. (Un)restoring the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of our nation’s waters: the emerging Clean Water Act jurisprudence of the Roberts Court. 28 Va. Envtl. L.J. 411-482 (2010).
Flatt, Victor B. Adapting energy and environmental policy for climate change. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 655-665 (2010).
Metcalf, Gilbert E. Cost containment in climate change policy: alternative approaches to mitigating price volatility. 29 Va. Tax Rev. 381-405 (2009).
Byrne, J. Peter. Rising seas and common law baselines: a comment on regulatory takings discourse concerning climate change. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 625-639 (2010).
Sax, Joseph L. Some unorthodox thoughts about rising sea levels, beach erosion, and property rights. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 641-654 (2010).
Wiseman, Hannah. Regulatory adaptation in fractured Appalachia. 21 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 229-292 (2010).
Logan, Tracy J. Carbon Down Under—lessons from Australia: two recommendations for clarifying subsurface property rights to facilitate onshore geologic carbon sequestration in the United States. 11 San Diego Int’l L.J. 561-599 (2010).
Chen, Joey Tsu-Yi. Green SOX for investors: requiring companies to disclose risks related to climate change. 5 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 325-356 (2010).
Mullikin, Nancy. Holding the “responsible corporate officer” responsible: addressing the need for expansion of criminal liability for corporate environmental violators. 3 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 395-426 (2010).
Charnovitz, Steve. Reviewing carbon charges and free allowances under environmental law and principles. 16 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 395-412 (2010).
Kaswan, Alice. Decentralizing cap-and-trade? State controls within a federal greenhouse gas cap-and-trade program. 28 Va. Envtl. L.J. 343-410 (2010).
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.
Marx, Daniel R. Grass root bureaucrats: how prediction markets can incentivize citizens to fill ESA data gaps. 66 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 129-172 (2010).
Clark, Kimberly Nicole. No democracy for animal lovers: the exclusion and marginalization of animal rights activists in America. 31 Whittier L. Rev. 319-343 (2009).
Gresser, Edward. Labor and environment in trade since NAFTA: activists have achieved less, and more, than they realize. 45 Wake Forest L. Rev. 491-525 (2010).
Grubbs, Kevin R. Saving lives or spreading fear: the terroristic nature of eco-extremism. 16 Animal L. 351-370 (2010).
Trimble, Travis M. Environmental law. 61 Mercer L. Rev. 1095-1111 (2010).
Federici, Valery. Genetically modified food and informed consumer choice: comparing U.S. and E.U. labeling laws. 35 Brook. J. Int’l L. 515-561 (2010).
Smith, Tempe. Note. Going to seed?: using Monsanto as a case study to examine the patent and antitrust implications of the sale and use of genetically modified seeds. 61 Ala. L. Rev. 629-648 (2010).
Kilbert, Kenneth K. The public trust doctrine and the Great Lakes shores. 58 Clev. St. L. Rev. 1-58 (2010).
Showalter, Stephanie and students Alex Porteshawver and Jennifer Tahtinen. Converting the Erie Pier Confined Disposal Facility to a processing and refuse facility: is an interstate compact a necessary component? 41 J. Mar. L. & Com. 197-234 (2010).
Eichenberg, M. Benjamin. Greenhouse gas regulation and border tax adjustments: the carrot and the stick. 3 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 283-364 (2010).
Duong, Tiffany T.V. Comment. When islands drown: the plight of “climate change refugees” and recourse to international human rights law. 31 U. Pa. J. Int’l L. 1239-1266 (2010).
Francioni, Francesco. International human rights in an environmental horizon. 21 Eur. J. Int’l L. 41-55 (2010).
Coldwell, Heather Ahlstrom. Comment. Fee simple estate and footholds in fishing: the Australian High Court’s formalistic interpretation of the Aboriginal Land Rights Act. 19 Pac. Rim L. & Pol’y J. 303-329 (2010).
Korman, Seth. Indigenous ancestral lands and customary international law. 32 U. Haw. L. Rev. 391-462 (2010).
Chang, Hannah. International executive agreements on climate change. 35 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 337-372 (2010).
Kornfeld, Itzchak. A global water apartheid: from revelation to resolution. 43 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 701-731 (2010).
Nanda, Ved P. Climate change and developing countries: the international law perspective. 16 ILSA J. Int’l & Comp. L. 539-556 (2010).
Wiersema, Annecoos. The new international law-makers? Conferences of the Parties to multilateral environmental agreements. 31 Mich. J. Int’l L. 231-287 (2009).
Labor and Environmental Protection in Free Trade Agreements: A New Paradigm? Articles by Chris Wold, Kevin Kolben, John H Knox, David Markell, Isabel Studer and Edward Gresser. 45 Wake Forest L. Rev. 319-525 (2010).
Batchis, Wayne. Enabling urban sprawl: revisiting the Supreme Court’s seminal zoning decision Euclis v. Ambler in the 21st century. 17 Va. J. Soc. Pol’y & L. 373-403 (2010).
Fox, David. Halting urban sprawl: smart growth in Vancouver and Seattle. 33 B.C. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 43-59 (2010).
Hirokawa, Keith H. and Patricia Salkin. Can urban university expansion and sustainable development co-exist?: a case study in progress on Columbia University. 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 637-697 (2010).
Smith, Nate. Extraterritorial condemnation for open space and parks: a look at Town of Telluride v. San Miguel Valley Corp.’s effect on Colorado and the Mountain West. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 779-804 (2010).
LAW OF THE SEA.
Pedrozo, Raul (Pete). Is it time for the United States to join the Law of the Sea Convention? 41 J. Mar. L. & Com. 151-166 (2010).
London, William Brian. The Fifth Circuit “SLAPPs” back: immediate appeal of anti-SLAPP motions under the collateral order doctrine in ... (Henry v. Lake Charles Am. Press, L.L.C., 566 F.3d 164 2009.) 84 Tul. L. Rev. 1335-1346 (2010).
Nolte, David R. Exxon v. Baker: legislating spills into the judiciary: how the Supreme Court sunk maritime punitive damages. (Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S. Ct. 2605, 2008.) 5 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 377-404 (2010).
Zuardo, Tara. Comment. Habitat-based conservation legislation: a new direction for sea turtle conservation. 16 Animal L. 317-350 (2010).
Chastain, Richard Aaron. Cleaning up punitive damages: a statutory solution for unguided punitive-damages awards in maritime cases. 63 Vand. L. Rev. 813-843 (2010).
Hebert, Cory. Ballast water management: federal, states, and international regulations. 37 S.U. L. Rev. 315-351 (2010).
King, Dennis M. and Mario N. Tamburri. Verifying compliance with ballast water discharge regulations. 41 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 152-165 (2010).
Papavizas, Constantine G. and Gerald A. Morrissey III. Does the Jones Act apply to offshore alternative energy projects? 34 Tul. Mar. L.J. 377-441 (2010).
McGinley, Patrick C. Bundled rights and reasonable expectations: applying the Lucas categorical taking rule to severed mineral property interests. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 525-578 (2010).
NATIVE AMERICAN LANDS.
Jarboe, Melanie Riccobene. Collective rights to indigenous land in ... (Carcieri v. Salazar, 129 S. Ct. 1058, 2009.) 30 B.C. Third World L.J. 395-415 (2010).
Schifman, Ben. Note. The limits of NEPA: consideration of the impacts of terrorism in environmental impact statements for nuclear facilities. 35 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 373-405 (2010).
Álvares-Verdugo, Milagros. Will climate change alter the NPT political balance? New challenges for the non-proliferation regime. 21 Eur. J. Int’l L. 205-219 (2010).
Wastler, Benjamin. Note. Having its yellowcake and eating it too: how the NSG waiver for India threatens to undermine the nuclear nonproliferation regime. 33 B.C. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 201-217 (2010).
Hall, Matthew. A catastrophic conundrum, but not a nuisance: why the judicial branch is ill-suited to set emissions restrictions on domestic energy producers through the common law nuisance doctrine. 13 Chapman L. Rev. 265-296 (2010).
Larson, Jennifer. Comment. Challenges under OCSLA and the future of offshore drilling under the Obama Administration. 13 SMU Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 55-87 (2009).
Erutku, Can and Vincent A. Hildebrand. Conspiracy at the pump. 53 J.L. & Econ. 223-237 (2010).
Hiorth, Megan. Are traditional property rights receding with renewable energy on the horizon? 62 Rutgers L. Rev. 527-558 (2010).
Eichenberg, Tim, Darcy Vaughn and student Sean Bothwell. Climate change and the public trust doctrine: using an ancient doctrine to adapt to rising sea levels in San Francisco Bay. 3 Golden Gate U. Envtl. L.J. 243-281 (2010).
Warner, Bridget M. Note. Sacking the culture of convenience: regulating plastic shopping bags to prevent further environmental harm. 40 U. Mem. L. Rev. 645-680 (2010).
The Future of Energy Policy: A National Renewable Portfolio Standard. Introduction by Emilee Mooney Scott; article by Lincoln L. Davies; responses by Joshua P. Fershee, Jim Rossi, David B. Spence and Lynn M. Fountain. 42 Conn. L. Rev. 1337-1491 (2010).
STATE AND LOCAL LAW.
Barrios, Sarah M. Meeting expectations: Arizona’s approach to the “potentially responsible party” notification and coverage under Commercial General Liability policies. 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 381-410 (2010).
Shavell, Steven. Eminent domain versus government purchase of land given imperfect information about owners’ valuations. 53 J.L. & Econ. 1-27 (2010).
Siegel, Daniel L. and Robert Meltz. Temporary takings: settled principles and unresolved questions. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 479-523 (2010).
Underkuffler, Laura S. Takings and the problem of value: grappling with truth in land-restriction cases. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 465-477 (2010).
Maitra, Neel. Note. Access to environmentally sound technology in the developing world: a proposed alternative to compulsory licensing. 35 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 407-445 (2010).
Green, Bryan A. The Guarani Aquifer & international groundwater law: advancing towards a legal framework for the management of a transboundary aquifer. 13 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 361-387 (2010).
Benson, Reed D. A bright idea from the Black Canyon: federal judicial review of reserved water right settlements. 13 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 229-281 (2010).
Craig, Robin Kundis. Adapting water law to public necessity: reframing climate change adaptation as emergency response and preparedness. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 709-756 (2010).
Davidson, John H. Adapting to climate change: transbasin water diversions and an example from the Missouri River Valley. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 757-777 (2010).
Echeverria, John D. Is regulation of water a constitutional taking? 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 579-624 (2010).
Garleb, Heather. PDG Land Development, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection: Pennsylvania’s Environmental Hearing Board declares all streams are created equal. 21 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 407-428 (2010).
Hughes, Richard A. Pro-justice ethics, water scarcity, human rights. 25 J.L. & Relig. 521-540 (2009-10).
Kwasniak, Arlene J. Water scarcity and aquatic sustainability: moving beyond policy limitations. 13 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 321-360 (2010).
Floryan, Michael. Cracking the foundation: highlighting and criticizing the shortcomings of mandatory inclusionary zoning practices. 37 Pepp. L. Rev. 1039-1112 (2010).
Michael, Jeffrey A. and Raymond B. Palmquist. Environmental land use restriction and property values. 11 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 437-464 (2010).
Post a Comment