Aslanian, Len. Student comment. A rook or a pawn: the White House science advisor in an age of climate confusion. 28 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 473-495 (2010).
Cooper, Aaron R. Note. Sidestepping Chevron: reframing agency
deference for an era of private governance.
99 Geo. L.J. 1431-1468 (2011).
Pollack, Michael C. Note. Chevron’s
regrets: the persistent vitality of the
nondelegation doctrine. 86 N.Y.U. L.
Rev. 316-350 (2011).
AGRICULTURE.
Blauser, Mary Beth. Note. The 2008 Farm Bill: friend or foe to conservationists and what
improvements are needed? 12 Vt. J.
Envtl. L. 547-569 (2011).
Cronauer, C. Nicholas.
Note. Flushing out the Illinois
Livestock Management Facilities Act. 45
Val. U. L. Rev. 637-688 (2011).
Guercio, Lara D. The struggle
between man and nature—agriculture, nonpoint source pollution, and clean
water: how to implement the State of
Vermont’s phosphorous TMDL within the Lake Champlain Basin. 12 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 455-545 (2011).
Newbold, Elizabeth. Note. Concentrated animal feeding operations and
manure runoff: supplementing current
regulation with community based initiatives.
12 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 571-590 (2011).
Paulsen, Aurora. Comment.
Welfare improvements for organic animals: closing loopholes in the regulation of
organic animal husbandry. 17 Animal L.
337-367 (2011).
Small, Slow, and Local: Essays
on Building a More Sustainable and Local Food System. Essays by Mary Jane Angelo, Amelia Timbers,
Matthew J. Walker, Joshua B. Donabedian, Devon Van Noble, Erik Phillips-Nania,
Emily Parish and Jennifer L. Perez. 12
Vt. J. Envtl. L. 353-425 (2011).
Wender, Melanie J. Comment. Goodbye family farms and hello
agribusiness: the story of how
agricultural policy is destroying the family farm and the environment. 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 141-167 (2011).
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY.
2010 Legislative Review.
Jennifer O’Brien, editor; Jenny Keatinge and Richard Myers, authors. 17 Animal L. 415-444 (2011).
Balzer, Kirsten S. Casenote.
Bats and breezes take on federal policy:
the windy effects of ... (Animal
Welfare Institute v. Beech Ridge Energy LLC, 675 F. Supp. 2d 540,
2009.) 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 225-257
(2011).
Lifshitz-Goldberg, Yael. Student comment. Gone with the wind? The potential tragedy of the common wind. 28 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 435-471 (2010).
McElfish, James M., Jr. and Sara Gersen. Local standards for wind power siting: a look at model ordinances. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis
10825-10839 (2011).
ALTERNATIVE FUELS.
Endres, Jody M. Agriculture at a
crossroads: energy biomass standards and
a new sustainability paradigm? 2011 U.
Ill. L. Rev. 503-547.
Khanna, Madhu, Xiaoguang Chen, Haixiao Huang and Hayri Önal. Land use and greenhouse gas mitigation effects
of biofuel policies. 2011 U. Ill. L.
Rev. 549-588.
Zilberman, David, Gal Hochman and Deepak Rajagopal. On the inclusion of indirect land use in
biofuel regulations. 2011 U. Ill. L.
Rev. 413-433.
ANIMAL LAW.
Barghusen, Steve. Noneconomic
damage awards in veterinary malpractice:
using the human medical experience as a model to predict the effect of
noneconomic damage awards on the practice of companion animal veterinary
medicine. 17 Animal L. 13-57 (2010).
Eisen, Jessica. Liberating
animal law: breaking free from human-use
typologies. 17 Animal L. 59-76 (2010).
Gay, Sebastien. Companion animal
capital. 17 Animal L. 77-95 (2010).
Hutchison, Katherine.
Comment. Should they go the way
of the horse and buggy? How the New York
City horse-drawn carriage industry has survived thirty years of
opposition. 17 Animal L. 171-196 (2010).
Lanza, Noreen. Keeping the “live” in live animal air cargo
transport. 76 J. Air L. & Com.
229-249 (2011).
Nowicki, Stacy A. Comment. On the lamb:
toward a national animal abuser registry. 17 Animal L. 197-242 (2010).
Sykes, Katie. Human drama,
animal trials: what the medieval animal
trials can teach us about justice for animals.
17 Animal L. 273-311 (2011).
Vesilind, Pamela A. Continental
drift: agricultural trade and the
widening gap between European Union and United States animal welfare laws. 12 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 223-254 (2011).
Wise, Steven M. Legal personhood
and the Nonhuman Rights Project. 17
Animal L. 1-11 (2010).
ARCHITECTURE.
Brewster, Constance J.
Comment. It’s not easy being
green, a green building, that is: how to
avoid disputes and allocate risks in the modern green building movement. 30 Miss. C.L. Rev. 65-86 (2011).
ARCTIC.
Carlane, Cinnamon P. Arctic
dreams and geoengineering wishes: the
collateral damage of climate change. 49
Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 602-669 (2011).
AUTOMOBILES.
Seligman, Jake. Comment. Electric vehicles and time-of-use rates: the impending role of the New York State
Public Service Commission in regulating our transportation future. 28 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 568-590 (2011).
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Nelson, Sharon L. The connection between animal abuse and
family violence: a selected annotated
bibliography. 17 Animal L. 369-414
(2011).
BIRDS.
Murray, Lauren B. Casenote. For the birds: judicial expansion of executive power in
... (Fund for Animals v. Kempthorne, 538 F.3d 124, 2008.) 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 31-55 (2011).
BOOK REVIEWS.
Marks, Joel. Live free or
die: On Their Own Terms: Bringing Animal-Rights Philosophy Down to
Earth by Lee Hall. 17 Animal L.
243-250 (2010).
Otts, Stephanie Showalter. A
review of Who Owns the Arctic?
(Reviewing Michael Byers, Who Owns the Arctic?) 16 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 239-244 (2010).
BROWNFIELDS.
Maro, Alexander. Note. Outsourcing the filth: privatizing brownfield remediation in New
Jersey. 38 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev.
159-191 (2011).
CERCLA.
Warren, Charles S. and Toni L. Finger.
Courts shed light on the application of CERCLA’s bona fide prospective purchaser defense. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis
10790-10792 (2011).
CLEAN AIR ACT.
McKinstry, Robert B., Jr. The
Clean Air Act: a suitable tool for
addressing the challenges of climate change.
41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10301-10311 (2011).
CLEAN WATER ACT.
Assessing Jurisdiction Under the New Clean Water Act Guidance. Bruce Myers, moderator; Donna Downing, Jan
Goldman-Carter, Lawrence R. “Larry” Liebesman and David B. Olson,
panelists. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News &
Analysis 10773-10789 (2011).
Connor, Hannah. Comprehensive
regulatory review: concentrated animal
feeding operations under the Clean Water Act from 1972 to the present. 12 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 275-326 (2011).
Frost, Carol D. and Jason M. Mailloux.
Establishing appropriate water quality numeric standards under the Clean
Water Act: lessons from a case study of
coalbed methane produced water discharge to the Powder River, Wyoming and
Montana. 11 Wyoming L. Rev. 1-23 (2011).
Henry, P. Ryan. Casenote.
Muddying the waters: United States v. Cundiff adds confusion
and complexity to the ongoing debate over the scope of federal jurisdiction
under the Clean Water Act. (United States v. Cundiff, 555 F.3d 200,
2009.) 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 285-319
(2011).
Watson, Kory R. Comment. Fill material pollution under the Clean Water
Act: a need for legislative change. 35 S. Ill. U. L.J. 335-356. (2011).
CLIMATE CHANGE.
Burleson, Elizabeth. Energy revolution and disaster response in
the face of climate change. 22 Vill.
Envtl. L.J. 169-188 (2011).
Bronen, Robin. Climate-induced community relocations: creating an adaptive governance framework
based in human rights doctrine. 35
N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 357-407 (2011).
Chepaitis, Daniel J. and Andrea K. Panagakis. Individualism submerged: climate change and the perils of an
engineered environment. 28 UCLA J.
Envtl. L. & Pol’y 291-342 (2010).
Hamilton, Neil D. Farming an
uncertain climate future: what COP 15
means for agriculture. 2011 U. Ill. L.
Rev. 341-359.
Karassin, Orr. Mind the
gap: knowledge and need in regulating
adaption to climate change. 22 Geo. Int’l
Envtl. L. Rev. 383-437 (2010).
Lawson, Samantha. Note. The conundrum of climate change
causation: using market share liability
to satisfy the identification requirement in ... (Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Co., 663 F. Supp. 2d 863,
2009.) 22 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 433-492
(2011).
Learner, Howard A. The Supreme
Court’s AEP decision: snatching climate change solutions victory
from the jaws of defeat. 41 Envtl. L.
Rep. News & Analysis 10793-10795 (2011).
Peloso, Chris. Crafting an
international climate change protocol:
applying the lessons learned from the success of the Montreal Protocol
and the ozone depletion problem. 25 J.
Land Use & Envtl. L. 305-329 (2010).
Schiraldi, Michael. Casenote. Rising temperatures, political questions, and public nuisances: the Second Circuit weighs in on the climate change debate in ... (Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., 582 F.3d 309, 2009.) 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 321-356 (2011).
COASTAL AREAS.
Delogu, Orlando E. Friend of the
court: an array of arguments to urge
reconsideration of the Moody Beach cases and expand public use rights in Maine’s
intertidal zone. 16 Ocean & Coastal
L.J. 47-113 (2010).
Kibel, Paul Stanton. The public trust navigates California’s Bay Delta. 51 Nat. Resources J. 35-93 (2011).
COMPARATIVE LAW.
Islam, Aamina. The Pakistan Supreme Court’s use of suo motu actions in environmental cases. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10326-10333 (2011).
Al Moumin, Mishkat. Transition to peace: examining divergent approaches to enacting
post-conflict environmental laws in
Afghanistan and El Salvador. 22 Geo. Int’l
Envtl. L. Rev. 755-790 (2010).
Rosencranz, Armi,. Dilpreet Singh and Jahnavi G. Pai. Climate change adaptation, policies and measures
in India. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev.
575-590 (2010).
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS.
Olmsted, James L. The butterfly
effect: conservation easements, climate
change, and invasive species. 38 B.C.
Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 41-76 (2011).Owley, Jessica. Changing property in a changing world: a call for the end of perpetual conservation easements. 30 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 121-173 (2011).
CORPORATIONS.
Bowen, Rachel. Note. Walking the talk: the effectiveness of environmental
commitments made by multilateral development banks. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 731-753 (2010).Taylor, Porcher L., III and Harris L. Kay. A green board as a climate-change imperative: appointing a climate-change expert to the audit committee. 18 U. Balt. J. Envtl. L. 215-261 (2011).
CRIMINAL LAW.
Muller-Harris, Debra L. Comment.
Animal violence court: a
therapeutic jurisprudence-based problem-solving court for the adjudication of animal
cruelty cases involving juvenile offenders and animal hoarders. 17 Animal L. 313-336 (2011).
DAMAGES.
Milne, Janet E. Earmarking for
environmental damage: from oil spills to
climate change. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News
& Analysis 10334-10347 (2011).
ELECTRICAL UTILITIES.
Stokes, Michael L. Moving the
lines: the common law of utility
relocation. 45 Val. U. L. Rev. 457-504
(2011).
EMISSIONS TRADING.
Boyd, William and James Salzman.
The curious case of greening in carbon markets. 41 Envtl. L. 73-94 (2011).
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.
Bork, Karrigan. Note. Listed species reintroductions on private
land: limiting landowner liability. 30 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 177-239 (2011).
Fitzgerald, Edward A. Delisting
wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains:
Congress cries wolf. 41 Envtl. L.
Rep. News & Analysis 10840-10851 (2011).
Groban, Matthew. Casenote.
Arizona Cattle Growers’
Association v. Salazar: does the
Endangered Species Act really give a hoot about the public interest it “claims”
to protect? (Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association v. Salazar, 606 F.3d 1160,
2010.) 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 259-283
(2011).
Kimbrell, Tristan. Note. Moving species and non-moving reserves: conservation banking and the impact of global climate change. 22 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 119-157 (2010).
Newcomer, Ed, Marie Palladini and Leah
Jones. The Endangered Species Act v. The
United States Department of Justice: how
the Department of Justice derailed criminal prosecutions under the Endangered
Species Act. 17 Animal L. 251-271
(2011).
Totoiu, Jason. Quantifying,
monitoring, and tracking “take” under the Endangered Species Act: the promise of a more informed approach to
consultation. 41 Envtl. L. 165-200
(2011).
ENERGY CONSERVATION.
Salzman, James. The Eleventh Annual Gilbert and Sara Kerlin
Lecture. What is the emperor
wearing? The secret lives of ecosystem
services. 28 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 591-613
(2011).
ENERGY MARKETS.
Werntz, Heidi. Let’s make a
deal: negotiated rates for merchant
transmission. 28 Pace Envtl. L. Rev.
421-479 (2011).
ENERGY POLICY.
2011 Energy Symposium. Articles
by Jeffrey C. King, Andrew D. Sims, J. Zach Burt, John P. Baker, Rob Davis,
Douglas R. Hafer, Daniel B. Mathis, Lilly Tade Van Maele, Rebecca Seidl and
Kelly Shapiro; comment by Brian J. Smith.
18 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 1-147 (2011).
Symposium: The Renewable Energy
Legislation Puzzle: Putting the Pieces
Together. Introduction by Jay P. Kesan,
articles by Neil D. Hamilton, Jim Rossi, Daniel A. Farber, David Zilberman, Gal
Hochman, Deepak Rajagopal, Jay P. Kesan, Atsushi Ohyama, James M. Van Nostrand,
Anne Marie Hirschberger, Jody M. Endres, Madhu Khanna, Xiaoguang Chen, Haixiao
Huang, Hayri Önal, Kristina K. Anderson-Teixeira, Peter K. Snyder, Evan H.
DeLucia, A. Bryan Endres, Elizabeth Burelson and Winslow Burleson. 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 333-694.
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISM.
Czarnezki, Jason J. Everyday
environmentalism: concerning
consumption. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News
& Analysis 10374-10379 (2011).
Pawa, Matthew F. The very
definition of folly: saving the earth
from environmentalists. 38 B.C. Envtl.
Aff. L. Rev. 77-93 (2011).
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS.
Centner, Terence J. Challenging
NPDES permits granted without public participation. 38 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 1-40 (2011).
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE.
Carter, Majora, et al. Whose
survival? Environmental justice as a
civil rights issue. 13 N.Y. City L. Rev.
257-290 (2010).
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
Aagaard, Todd S. Environmental
harms, use conflicts, and neutral baselines in environmental law. 60 Duke L.J. 1505-1564 (2011).
EUROPEAN UNION.
Marsden, Simon. Invoking direct application
and effect of international treaties by the European Court of Justice: implications for international environmental
law in the European Union. 60 Int’l
& Comp. L.Q. 737-757 (2011).
McMahon, Joe A and Stephanie Switzer.
EU biofuels policy—raising the question of WTO compatibility. 60 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 713-736 (2011).
van Zeben, Josephine A.W. The
untapped potential of horizontal private enforcement within European
environmental law. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl.
L. Rev. 241-269 (2010).
FEDERALISM.
Babich, Adam. Can preemption
protect public participation? 61 Case W.
Res. L. Rev. 1109-1152 (2011).
FISHERIES.
Kutil, Sarah M. Comment. Scientific certainty thresholds in fisheries
management: a response to a changing
climate. 41 Envtl. L. 233-275 (2011).
Merrill, James William.
Comment. Trawling for
meaning: a new standard for “best
scientific information available” in the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries
Conservation Act. 60 Cath. U. L. Rev.
475-503 (2011).
Rieser, Alison. Saving Salmo:
federalism and the conservation of Maine’s Atlantic salmon. 16 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 135-179 (2010).
FORESTS.
Kammer, Sean M. The railroads
must have ties: a legal history of
forest conservation and the Oregon and California Railroad land grant, 1887-1916. [Includes photographs.] 23 W. Legal Hist. 1-20 (2010).
GENETIC MODIFICATION.
DeBona, Michael. Comment. Letting a hundred transgenic flowers
blossom: the future of genetically
modified agriculture in the People’s Republic of China. 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 89-115 (2011).
GLOBAL WARMING.
Grainey, Michael W. Global
warming and its impact on water supply.
The energy implications of climate change and the effects of our energy
choices. 47 Willamette L. Rev. 593-626
(2011).
GREAT LAKES.
Johnson-Karp, Gabe.
Comment. That the waters shall be
forever free: navigating Wisconsin’s
obligations under the public trust doctrine and the Great Lakes Compact. 94 Marq. L. Rev. 415-449 (2010).
GREENHOUSE GASES.
Baker-Branstetter, Shannon.
Distributed renewable generation:
the trifecta of energy solutions to curb carbon emissions, reduce
pollutants, and empower ratepayers. 22
Vill. Envtl. L.J. 1-29 (2011).
Braun, Kirsten. Note. Carbon storage: discerning resource biases that influence
treaty negotiations. 22 Geo. Int’l
Envtl. L. Rev. 649-706 (2010).
Brubaker, Morgan. Comment. Dream of Californication: constitutional questions put the breaks on
the nation’s first low carbon fuel standard.
22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 57-88 (2011).
Cooley, David M. and Jonas J. Monast.
Carbon offsets and environmental impacts: NEPA, the Endangered Species Act, and federal
climate policy. 28 Pace Envtl. L. Rev.
377-420 (2011).
Endres, A. Bryan. Geologic
carbon sequestration: balancing efficiency
concerns and public interest in property rights allocations. 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 623-650.
Prum, Darren A. and Sarah L. Catz.
Greenhouse gas emission targets and mass transit: can the government successfully accomplish
both without a conflict? 51 Santa Clara
L. Rev. 935-987 (2011).
Reitze, Arnold W., Jr. Federal
control of carbon capture and storage.
41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10796-10824 (2011).
Segal, Scott H. New source
performance standards for global greenhouse gas emissions from the power and
refining sectors: wrong mechanism at the
wrong time. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News &
Analysis 10312-10315 (2011).
Takacs, David. Forest carbon
offsets and international law: a deep
equity legal analysis. 22 Geo. Int’l
Envtl. L. Rev. 521-574 (2010).
Verheul, John. Student article. Methane as a greenhouse gas: why the EPA should regulate emissions from
animal feeding operations and concentrated animal feeding operations under the
Clean Air Act. 51 Nat. Resources J.
163-187 (2011).
HERITAGE SITES.
Miller, Steven R. Historic
signs, commercial speech, and the limits of preservation. 25 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. 227-263
(2010).
Neil, Jeremy. Comment. Shifting through the wreckage: an analysis and proposed resolution
concerning the disposition of historic shipwrecks located in international
waters. 55 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 895-921
(2010/11).
IMMIGRATION.
DeWitte, Claire. Comment. At the water’s edge: legal protections and funding for a new
generation of climate change refugees.
16 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 211-238 (2010).
Doran, Amanda A. Comment. Where should the Haitians go? Why “environmental refugees” are up the creek without a paddle. 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 117-140 (2011).
INSURANCE LAW.
Davis, Wesley. Comment. Lessons learned from the flood insurance
re-mapping controversy in Portland, Maine.
16 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 181-209 (2010).
INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Long, Andrew. Global climate
governance to enhance biodiversity and well-being: integrating non-state networks and public
international law in tropical forests.
41 Envtl. L. 95-164 (2011).
KYOTO.
Ferrey, Steven. Cubing the Kyoto
Protocol: post-Copenhagen regulatory
reforms to reset the global thermostat.
28 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 343-386 (2010).
LABELING.
Czarnezki, Jason J. The future
of food eco-labeling: organic, carbon
footprint, and environmental life-cycle analysis. 30 Stan. Envtl. L.J. 3-49 (2011).
Ditta, Frank David. Note. Leading the way in unconstitutional
delegations of legislative power:
statutory incorporation of the LEED rating system. 39 Hofstra L. Rev. 369-404 (2010).
Liu, Chenglin. Is “USDA ORGANIC” a seal of deceit?: the pitfalls of USDA certified organics
produced in the United States, China, and beyond. 47 Stan. J. Int’l L. 333-378 (2011).
LAND USE.
Daloz, Todd W. Farm
preservation: a Vermont land-use
perspective. 12 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 427-453
(2011).
Rog, Morgan E. Note. Highway to the danger zone: urban sprawl, land use, and the
environment. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L.
Rev. 707-729 (2010).
Rumley, Rusty. A comparison of
the general provisions found in right-to-farm statutes. 12 Vt. J. Envtl. L. 327-351 (2011).
Stahl, Kenneth A. The artifice
of local growth politics: at-large
elections, ballot-box zoning, and judicial review. 94 Marq. L. Rev. 1-75 (2010).
LAW OF THE SEA.
Larkin, John E.D. UNCLOS and the
balance of environmental and economic resources in the Arctic. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 307-336 (2010).
Pavliha, Marko and Norman A. Martínez Gutiérrez. Marine scientific research and the 1982
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. 16 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 115-133 (2010).
LEGAL PROCESS.
Baker, John P. Procedural issues
in eminent domain. 18 Tex. Wesleyan L.
Rev. 29-38 (2011).
Guarino, Katherine A. Note. The power of one: citizen suits in the fight against global
warming. 38 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev.
125-158 (2011).
Steiner, Julie E. Should “substitute”
private attorneys general enforce public environmental actions? Balancing the costs and benefits of the
contingency fee environmental special counsel arrangement. 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 853-883 (2011).
MARINE RESOURCES.
Lamirande, Heidi R. Note. From sea to carbon cesspool: preventing the world’s marine ecosystems from
falling victim to ocean acidification.
34 Suffolk Transnat’l L. Rev. 183-217 (2011).
Walker, Paula. Oceans in the
balance: as the sharks go, so go
we. 17 Animal L. 97-170 (2010).
Weber, Katherine. Can you eat
your fish & save it too? Improving
the protection of pirated marine species through international trade
measures. 25 J. Land Use & Envtl. L.
265-304 (2010).
MARITIME LAW.
Karim, Md. Saiful. Environmental
pollution from the shipbreaking industry:
international law and national legal response. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 185-240 (2010).
MINING.
Gallagher, William. EHB review.
Emerald Coal Resources, L.P. v.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection: letter of law trumps miner safety. (Emerald
Coal Resources, L.P. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of
Environmental Protection, No. 2009-023-L, 2010 WL 944146, 2010.) 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 357-379 (2011).
NATIVE AMERICAN LANDS.
Dreveskracht, Ryan David. Native
Nation economic development via the implementation of solar projects: how to make it work. 68 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 27-112 (2011).
Prieksat, Matthew J. Note. Preventing a pipeline to nowhere: the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act as a
model for resolving the unsettled land claims of the First Nations of
Canada. 19 Transnat’l L. & Contemp.
Probs. 977-1007 (2011).
NATURAL GAS.
Kennedy, Michelle L. The exercise of local control over gas
extraction. 22 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev.
375-392 (2011).
‘Shale’ We Drill? The Legal and Environmental Impacts of Extracting
Natural Gas from Marcellus Shale:
Villanova Environmental Law Journal Symposium. Todd Aagaard, emcee; Andrew C. Mergen,
moderator; John Baillie, Phillip Bender, Thomas W. Beauduy, Terry Engelder,
Scott Perry, John W. Ubinger, Jr. and Hannah Wiseman, participants. 22 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 189-224 (2011).
Smith Brian J. Comment. Fracing the environment?: an examination of the effects and regulation
of hydraulic fracturing. 18 Tex.
Wesleyan L. Rev. 129-147 (2011).
NATURAL RESOURCES.
Schramm, Daniel and Akiva Fishman.
Legal frameworks for adaptive natural resource management in a changing
climate. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev.
491-520 (2010).NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS.
Langridge, Ruth. When do challengers succeed? Nongovernmental actors, administrative agencies, and legal change: shifting rules for Oregon’s private forests. 36 Law & Soc. Inquiry 662-693 (2011).
NUCLEAR ENERGY.
Dreveskracht, Ryan David. Native
Nation economic development via the implementation of solar projects: how to make it work. 68 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 27-112 (2011).
NUCLEAR WASTE.
Kenny, Tom. Note. Where to put it all? Opening the judicial road for a long-term
solution to the nation’s nuclear waste problem.
86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1319-1348 (2011).
NUISANCE.
Wood, John. Comment. Easier said than done: displacing public nuisance when states sue
for climate change damages. 41 Envtl. L.
Rep. News & Analysis 10316-10325 (2011).
OIL.
Richardson, Jennifer A.C.
Note. Protecting surface land by
internalizing the cost of oil and gas development: Wyoming’s Surface Owner Association Act
strikes a more sustainable balance. 38
Hastings Const. L.Q. 697-719 (2011).
OIL SPILLS.
Osofsky, Hari M. Multidimensional governance and the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1077-1137 (2011).
PETROLEUM INDUSTRY.
Fitzsimmons, Shauna.
Comment. A life beyond the
lease: the pooling power survives the
termination of the oil and gas lease in Texas.
(Wagner & Brown v. Sheppard,
282 S.W.3d 419, 2008.) 43 Tex. Tech. L.
Rev. 719-754 (2011).
PUBLIC LANDS.
Aarons, Kyle J. Note. The real world roadless rules
challenges. 109 Mich. L. Rev. 1293-1325
(2011).
Wrabley, Raymond B., Jr.
Showdown at Catron: cows, wolves,
and the ecology of public lands policies.
51 Nat. Resources J. 119-161 (2011).
RCRA.
Somers, Michael. Note. RCRA’s new causation question: linking ubiquitous wastes to specific
defendants. 38 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev.
193-217 (2011).
RISK ANALYSIS.
Stedeford, Todd and Marek Banasik.
International chemical control laws and the future of regulatory testing
for risk assessment. 22 Geo. Int’l
Envtl. L. Rev. 619-647 (2010).
STATE AND LOCAL LAW.
Annand, John R. Note. A coordinated approach to growth control in
Northern Virginia. 52 Wm. & Mary L.
Rev. 1679-1716 (2011).
Toma, Byron K. The error of
streamlining CEQA for transit priority projects: why California transit agencies may share the
same future as polar bears. 18 U. Balt.
J. Envtl. L. 171-213 (2011).
TAKINGS.
Bernier, Michael V. Note. When the legislature robs Peter to pay
Paul: pretextual takings and ... (Goldstein
v. Pataki, 516 F.3d 50, 2008.) 30
Miss. C.L. Rev. 87-120 (2011).
Eminent Domain in the United States:
Public Use, Just Compensation, & “The Social Compact.” Foreword by Robert S. Barrows; introduction
by Ilya Somin; articles by Gideon Kanner, Norman Siegel, Steven Hyman, Philip
van Buren, Steven J. Eagle, Michael Rikon, David Schultz, Amy Lavine,
Christopher Dunn, Robert McNamara and M. Robert Goldstein. 4 Alb. Gov’t L. Rev. 1-324 (2011).
Gieseler, Nicholas M. and Steven Geoffrey Gieseler. Strict scrutiny and eminent domain after Kelo.
25 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. 191-226 (2010).
Nelson, Ricky J. Comment. Inverse condemnation actions present unique
problems when determining “just compensation.”
2010 BYU L. Rev. 2315-2344.
Richardson, Sally Brown. Nonuse
and easements: creating a pliability
regime of private eminent domain. 78
Tenn. L. Rev. 1-45 (2010).
Peloso, Margaret E. and Margaret R. Caldwell. Dynamic property rights: the public trust doctrine and takings in a
changing climate. 30 Stan. Envtl. L.J.
51-120 (2011).
TORTS.
Kysar, Douglas A. What climate
change can do about tort law. 41 Envtl.
L. 1-71 (2011).
TOXICS.
Kvinge, John. Note. Morally hazardous chemical regulations: why effective reform of the TSCA requires
reduction of the toxic data gap. 12
Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 313-334 (2011).
Morgan, Toby K.L. Note. Down the drain: pharmaceutical waste disposal in the United
States. 22 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev.
393-431 (2011).
TRANSNATIONAL WATERWAYS.
Dornbos, Jeffrey S. All (water)
politics is local: a proposal for
resolving transboundary water disputes.
22 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 1-41 (2010).
TRANSPORTATION.
Lewyn, Michael. What would Coase
do? (About parking regulation). 22 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 89-118 (2010).
TROPICAL FORESTS.
Irland, Lloyd C. “The big trees were kings”: challenges for global response to climate
change and tropical forest loss. 28 UCLA
J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 387-434 (2010).
URBAN ENVIRONMENT.
Harris, Douglas C. Condominium
and the city: the rise of property in
Vancouver. 36 Law & Soc. Inquiry
694-726 (2011).
Seher, Ryan. Comment. I want to ride my bicycle: why and how cities plan for bicycle
infrastructure. 59 Buff. L. Rev. 585-619
(2011).
WATER LAW.
Beagles, Mallory A.
Comment. Hydrating the Lone Star
State for years to come: a call to
implement instream flow protections. 43
Tex. Tech. L. Rev. 687-717 (2011).
Behnampour, Leila C.
Comment. Reforming a western
institution: how expanding the
productivity of water rights could lesson our woes. 41 Envtl. L. 201-231 (2011).
Bretsen, Stephen N. Rainwater harvesting under Colorado’s prior
appropriation doctrine: property rights
and takings. 22 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev.
159-230 (2011).
Cloran, William F. The ownership
of water in Oregon: public property vs.
private commodity. 47 Willamette L. Rev.
627-672 (2011).
Hesser, Justin Newell.
Comment. The nature of interstate
groundwater resources and the need for states to effectively manage the
resource through interstate compacts. 11
Wyoming L. Rev. 25-46 (2011).
McGraw, George S. Defining and
defending the right to water and its minimum core: legal construction and the role of national
jurisprudence. 8 Loy. U. Chi. Int’l L.
Rev. 127-204 (2011).
Skaggs, Rhonda, et al. The convergence of water rights, structural
change, technology, and hydrology: a
case study of New Mexico’s lower Rio Grande.
51 Nat. Resources J. 95-117 (2011).
WATER RESOURCES.
Hoffer, Mark D. The New York City Watershed Memorandum of
Agreement: forging a partnership to
protect water quality. 18 U. Balt. J.
Envtl. L. 113-170 (2011).Snodgrass, R.F. Michael. Note. Greywater — the reuse of household water: a small step toward sustainable living and adaptation to climate change. 22 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 591-617 (2010).
WILDLIFE.
Fischman, Robert and Robert S. Adamcik. Beyond trust species: the conservation potential of the National Wildlife Refuge System in the wake of climate change. 51 Nat. Resources J. 1-33 (2011).
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION.
Lagomarsino, Jeffrey. WTO
dispute settlement and sustainable development:
legitimacy through holistic treaty interpretation. 28 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 545-567 (2011).ZONING.
Smith, George P. II and Gregory P. Bailey. Regulating morality through the common law and exclusionary zoning. 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 403-444 (2011).
Sterk, Stewart E. and Kimberly J. Brunelle. Zoning finality: reconceptualizing res judicata doctrine in land use cases. 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1139-1188 (2011).
No comments:
Post a Comment