Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Recent Law Review Articles -- March 2011

Ahdieh, Robert B., The visible hand: coordination functions of the regulatory state. 95 Minn. L. Rev. 578-649 (2010).

Bailly, Rose Mary., Administrative law. 60 Syracuse L. Rev. 661-688 (2010).

Note. Chevron and the substantive canons: a categorical distinction. (Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 1984.) 124 Harv. L. Rev. 594-615 (2010).

Kelly, Claire R., The Brand X liberation: doing away with Chevron’s second step as well as other doctrines of deference. 44 UC Davis L. Rev. 151-211 (2010).

Magee, Claire, Using Chevron as a guide: allowing for the precautionary principle in WTO practices. (Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 1984.) 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 615-638 (2009).

Austin, Jonathan R., Prairie winds: a look at commercial wind farm regulation within Kansas. (Zimmerman v. Board of County Commissioners of Wabaunsee County, 218 P.3d 400, 2009.) 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 104-121 (2010).

France, Jamie E., A proposed solar access law for the state of Texas. 89 Tex. L. Rev. 187-205 (2010).

Spittell, John H., A perilous climate: how domestic electric corporations can most advantageously prepare for and respond to a post-American Electric existence. (Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., 582 F.3d 309, 2009.) 8 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 419-451 (2010).

Challener, Deborah J., Protecting cats and dogs in order to protect humans: making the case for a felony companion animal statute in Mississippi. 29 Miss. C.L. Rev. 499-528 (2010).

Reese, Megan K., Kentucky courts have taken the “bite” out of dog-bite legislation: reforming the law to impose strict liability on dog owners. 47 U. Louisville L. Rev. 215-239 (2008).

Hertell, Hans H., Arctic melt: the tipping point for an Arctic Treaty. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 565-589 (2009).

Farber, Daniel A., Taking responsibility for the planet. (Reviewing Douglas A. Kysar, Regulating from Nowhere: Environmental Law and the Search for Objectivity.) 89 Tex. L. Rev. 147-185 (2010).

Gaynor, Kevin A., Benjamin S. Lippard and Sean M. Lonnquist. Unresolved CERCLA issues after Atlantic Research and Burlington Northern. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11198-11210 (2010).

Wheeler, Katie Jo., No PRP left behind: the Tenth Circuit allows non-settling PRPs to intervene as of right in CERCLA consent decree actions. (United States v. Albert Investment Co., 585 F.3d 1386, 2009.) 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 122-143 (2010).

Glover-Rogers, Mary Cile, Who’s footing the bill for the attorney’s fees? An examination of the policy underlying the Clean Water Act’s citizen suit provision. (Saint John’s Organic Farm v. Gem County Mosquito Abatement District, 574 F.3d 1054, 2009.) 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 64-82 (2010).

King, Andrew, Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Brown: delivering the back cuts? The Ninth Circuit leaves the Silvicultural Rule in the balance. (Nw. Evntl. Def. Ctr. V. Brown, 617 F.3d 1176, 2010.) 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 159-171 (2010).

Abate, Randall S., REDD, white, and blue: is proposed U.S. climate legislation adequate to promote a global carbon credits system for avoided deforestation in a post-Kyoto regime? 19 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 95-112 (2010).

Abebe, Daniel and Jonathan S. Masur, International agreements, internal heterogeneity, and climate change: the “two Chinas” problem. 50 Va. J. Int’l L. 325-389 (2010).

Breakfield, Ashley E., Political cases or political questions: the justiciability of public nuisance climate change litigation and the impact on ... (Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil, 663 F. Supp. 2d 863, 2009.) 17 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 39-62 (2011).

Carlarne, Cinnamon, The glue that binds or the straw that broke the camel’s back?: exploring the implications of U.S. reengagement in global climate change negotiations. 19 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 113-150 (2010).

Hessler, Jeremy, A temporary solution to climate change: the federal common law to the rescue. 38 Hastings Const. L.Q. 407-438 (2011).

Howe, Nathan, The political question doctrine’s role in climate change nuisance litigation: are power utilities the first of many casualties? 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11229-11241 (2010).

Leonard, Damien, Raising the levee: Dutch land use law as a model for U.S. adaptation to climate change. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 543-563 (2009).

Nagle, Mary Kathryn, Tracing the origins of fairly traceable: the black hole of private climate change litigation. 85 Tul. L. Rev. 477-517 (2010).

Richards, Kenneth R. and Stephanie Hayes Richards, U.S. Senate climate change bills in the 110th Congress: learning by doing. 33 Environs 1-110 (2009).

Sinden, Amy, Shifting the domestic and international logjams on climate change: a new defense of cap and dividend. 19 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 79-93 (2010).

Kalen, Sam, et al., Lingering relevance of the Coastal Zone Management Act to energy development in our nation’s coastal waters? 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 73-112 (2010).

Burton, Camden D., Recent development. An inconvenient risk: climate change disclosure and the burden on corporations. 62 Admin. L. Rev. 1287-1305 (2010).

Hirsch, Dennis D., Green business and the importance of reflexive law: what Michael Porter didn’t say. 62 Admin. L. Rev. 1063-1126 (2010).

Knee, Jeremy, Guidance for the awkward: outgrowing the adolescence of state electronic waste laws. 33 Environs 157-188 (2009).

Faure, Michael, Morag Goodwin and Franziska Weber, Bucking the Kuznets curve: designing effective environmental regulation in developing countries. 51 Va. J. Int’l L. 95-156 (2010).

Tai, Stephanie, When natural science meets the dismal science. 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 949-1018 (2010).

Haber, Hanan, Regulating-for-welfare: a comparative study of “regulatory welfare regimes” in the Israeli, British, and Swedish electricity sectors. 33 Law & Pol’y 116-148 (2011).

Fogel, Lawrence, Serving a “public function”: why regional cap-and-trade programs should survive a dormant Commerce Clause challenge. 2010 Wis. L. Rev. 1313-1352.

Galle, Brian and Manuel Utset, Is cap-and-trade fair to the poor? Shortsighted households and the timing of consumption taxes. 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 33-100 (2010).

Wymyslo, Joanna, Legitimizing peer review in ESA listing decisions. 33 Environs 135-156 (2009).

Chertok, Mark A. and Ashley S. Miller, Environmental law. 60 Syracuse L. Rev. 925-946 (2010).

Environmental law updates. 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 144-168 (2010).

Jaffe, Caleb A. and Sean M. Carney, Environmental law. 45 U. Rich. L. Rev. 287-318 (2010).

Kingston, Suzanne, Environment. 59 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 1129-1141 (2010).

Recent developments. In the courts. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11257-11258 (2010).

Recent developments. In the federal agencies. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11258-11261 (2010).

Recent developments. In the state agencies. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11262-11264 (2010).

Recent developments. In the Congress. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11264 (2010).

Recent developments in environmental law. 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 187-219 (2010).

Diaz, Leticia M. and Barry Hart Dubner, Foreign fishing piracy vs. Somalia piracy—does wrong equal wrong? 14 Barry L. Rev. 73-96 (2010).

Forderer, Joseph, State sponsored global warming litigation: federalism properly utilized or abused? 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 23-63 (2010).

Tracy, Kirk, Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene: low carbon fuel standards, lifecycle greenhouse gases, and California’s continued struggle to lead the way. (Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene, 2010 WL 2490999.) 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 173-185 (2010).

Ford, Samuel, North Carolina ex rel. Cooper v. Tennessee Valley Authority: the problem with state nuisance law in the regulation of out-of-state emissions standards. (North Carolina ex rel. Cooper v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 615 F.3d 291, 2010.) 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 147-157 (2010).

Bridges, Buckley W., 2010: a second odyssey into Arkansas land-use law. 33 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 9-44 (2010).

Pushaw, Robert J., Jr., Limiting Article III standing to “accidental” plaintiffs: lessons from environmental and animal law cases. 45 Ga. L. Rev. 1-105 (2010).

Sielen, Alan B., The new international rules on ocean dumping: promise and performance. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 495-540 (2009).

Myers, Elizabeth M., Cleaning up the mess: the economic, environmental, and cultural impact of U.S. military base closures on surrounding communities. 10 Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 135-150 (2010).

Duruigbo, Emeka, The global energy challenge and Nigeria’s emergence as a major gas power: promise, peril or paradox of plenty? 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 395-453 (2009).

Donovan, Emily, Deferring to the assertion of national security: the creation of a national security exemption under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 17 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 3-29 (2011).

The National Environmental Policy Act 40th Anniversary Symposium. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11183-11197 (2010).

Courselle, Diane, We (used to?) make a good gumbo—the BP DEEPWATER HORIZON disaster and the heightened threats to the unique cultural communities of the Louisiana Gulf Coast. 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 19-39 (2010).

Houck, Oliver A., Worst case and the DEEPWATER HORIZON blowout: there ought to be a law. 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 1-18 (2010).

Vance, Susan Molero and Paul N. Vance, OPA 90 in 2010: a maritime perspective. 24 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 113-145 (2010).

Brennan, James and Thomas A. Utzinger, Environmental risks of acquiring property by foreclosure. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11211-11214 (2010).

Magee, Claire, Using Chevron as a guide: allowing for the precautionary principle in WTO practices. (Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 1984.) 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 615-638 (2009).

Sanders, Aaron, Where are we going to put all of this junk? The Ninth Circuit dismisses an attempt to construct a large landfill in Southern California. (National Parks & Conservation Association v. Bureau of Land Management, 606 F.3d 1058, 2010.) 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 83-103 (2010).

Behles, Deborah, Why CEQA exemption decisions need additional notice requirements. 33 Environs 111-134 (2009).

Torres, Elise, The legal implications of the Delta Vision strategic plan. 17 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 65-90 (2011).

Hill, H. Lee, II, The purpose is to avoid public use: the need for in eminent domain reform in Mississippi. 29 Miss. C.L. Rev. 631-661 (2010).

Faulk, Richard O., Uncommon law: ruminations on public nuisance. 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 1-22 (2010).

Liebesman, Lawrence R., Rafe Petersen and Michael Galano. Rapanos v. United States: searching for a significant nexus using proximate causation and foreseeability principles. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11242-11256 (2010).

Mank, Bradford, Revisiting the Lyons den: Summers v. Earth Island Institute’s misuse of Lyons’s “realistic threat” of harm standing test. 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 837-899 (2010).

Brickey, Carolyn, et al., How to take climate change into account: a guidance document for judges adjudicating water disputes. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11215-11228 (2010).

Szalay, Endre, Breathing life into the dead zone: can the federal common law of nuisance be used to control nonpoint source water pollution? 85 Tul. L. Rev. 215-246 (2010).

O’Shea, Shannon, Lucas leaves room for categorical defenses for regulations of wetlands that are critical to water resources and essential for public drinking. 5 FIU L. Rev. 243-291 (2009).

Rice, Terry, Zoning and land use. 60 Syracuse L. Rev. 1157-1199 (2010).

No comments: