Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Recent Law Review Articles -- February 2011

Raso, Connor N. and William N. Eskridge, Jr. Chevron as a canon, not a precedent: an empirical study of what motivates justices in agency deference cases. 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1727-1817 (2010).

Smith, Craig. Taking “due account” of the APA’s prejudicial-error rule. 96 Va. L. Rev. 1727-1765 (2010).

Hemingson, Tate L. Why airlines should be afraid: the potential of cap and trade and other carbon emissions reduction proposals on the airline industry. 75 J. Air L. & Com. 741-773 (2010).

Bynum, Marvin C. II. Testing the waters: assessing Wisconsin’s regulatory climate for offshore wind projects. 93 Marq. L. Rev. 1533-1585 (2010).

Schroeder, Erica. Comment. Turning offshore wind on. 98 Cal. L. Rev. 1631-1667 (2010).

Stromberg, Scott F. Has the sun set on solar rights? Examining the practicality of the Solar Rights Acts. 50 Nat. Resources J. 211-253 (2010).

Simpson, Brett. International involvement in preservation of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest: context, constraints and scope. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 39-59 (2010).

Blumenfeld, Rachel. Dog baiting abatement: using nuisance abatement to regulate dogfighting. 17 Sports Law. J. 1-26 (2010).

Marsden, Simon. Book review. (Reviewing Klaus Bosselmann, The Principle of Sustainability — Transforming Law and Governance.) 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 147-150 (2010).

Foster, Robert B. The better part of valor is co-location: recent developments in judicial review of land use regulation of cellular telecommunications under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. 42 Urb. Law. 595-606 (2010).

Jekic, Milos. Lowering the jurisdictional bar: a call for equitable-factors analysis under CERCLA’s timing-of-review provision. 59 U. Kan. L. Rev. 157-190 (2010).

Franklin, Charles L. Dispersant scrutiny mirrors larger debate over U.S. chemical control policy. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11142-11146 (2010).

Struwe, David Robert. Muddying the waters of the Clean Water Act: applying Chevron deference to the CWA pollutant permit regulatory scheme in ... (Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, 129 S. Ct. 2458, 2009.) 29 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 171-204 (2010).

Carlarne, Cinnamon. Climate change, cultural heritage & the oceans: rethinking regulatory approaches to climate change. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 271-293 (2009).

Case, Lauren. Comment. Climate change: a new realm of tort litigation, and how to recover when the litigation heats up. 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 265-298 (2011).

Coleman, Felicia C. and Laura E. Petes. Getting into hot water: ecological effects of climate change in marine environments. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 337-357 (2009).

Fraley, Jill M. Re-examining acts of God. 27 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 669-690 (2010).

Griffin, Ronald C. A prairie perspective on global warming and climate change: the use of law, technology, and economics to establish private sector markets to compliment Kyoto. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 95-135 (2008).

King, Katherine. Climate change and the Inuit: a melting of actions into a cloudy mess. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 481-510 (2009).

Knox, John H. Climate change and human rights law. 50 Va. J. Int’l L. 163-218 (2009).

Leary, David. The corporatisation of international responses to climate change: the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 17-37 (2010).

Lovins, L. Hunter. Climate capitalism: the business case for climate protection. 27 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 735-779 (2010).

Inabinet, Hollis. Finding common ground on shifting sands: coastal zone regulatory bodies, governance, and program effectiveness in South Carolina. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 429-456 (2009).

Thompson, Michael J., Jr. A time to protect: revising Louisiana Mineral Code Article 122 to protect coastal restoration projects. 56 Loy. L. Rev. 413-445 (2010).

Briese, Robyn. Climate change mitigation down under: legislative responses in a federal system. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 75-114 (2010).

Clarke, Pepe and Carine David. New provincial environmental legislation in New Caledonia: continuity and reform in environmental governance in a French Pacific territory. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 135-145 (2010).

Marsden, Simon. Environmental impact assessment in Hong Kong: an evaluation of principles, procedures and practice post-1997. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 115-133 (2010).

Shearing, Susan. Australia’s national heritage law framework under review. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 1-15 (2010).

Signet, William D. Grading a revolution: 100 years of Mexican land reform. 16 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. 481-530 (2010).

Simpson, Brett. International involvement in preservation of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest: context, constraints and scope. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 39-59 (2010).

Babcock, Hope M. Corporate environmental social responsibility: corporate “greenwashing” or a corporate culture game changer? 21 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 1-78 (2010).

Firger, Daniel M. Transparency and the natural resource curse: examining the new extraterritorial information forcing rules in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010. 41 Geo. J. Int’l L. 1043-1095 (2010).

Guruswamy, Lakshman. State responsibility in promoting environmental corporate accountability. 21 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 209-237 (2010).

Welly, Nicholas D. Enlightened state-interest—a legal framework for protecting the “common interest of all mankind” from Hardinian tragedy. 36 J. Space L. 273-313 (2010).

Coppolecchia, Elizabeth K. The greenwashing deluge: who will rise above the waters of deceptive advertising? 64 U. Miami L. Rev. 1353-1405 (2010).

Fliegelman, Jessica E. The next generation of greenwash: diminishing consumer confusion through a national eco-labeling program. 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1001-1056 (2010).

Bennett, Lisa. Are tradable carbon emissions credits investments? Characterization and ramifications under international investment law. 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1581-1617 (2010).

O’Brien, Garrett. One-stop certification: the Turk Plant and understanding Arkansas’s major utility facility siting certification process. 63 Ark. L. Rev. 579-618 (2010).

Riti, Christopher. Three sheets to the wind: the Renewable Energy Production Tax Credit, congressional political posturing, and an unsustainable energy policy. 27 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 783-821 (2010).

Rodgers, William H., Jr. and student Anna T. Moritz. The worst case and the worst example: an agenda for any young lawyer who wants to save the world from climate chaos. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 295-335 (2009).

Recent developments. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11161-11174 (2010).

Recent journal literature. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11175-11176 (2010).

Wood, Mary Christina. “You can’t negotiate with a beetle”: environmental law for a new ecological age. 50 Nat. Resources J. 167-210 (2010).

Taylor, Kelly F. A trickle of cash for the river of grass: federal funding of comprehensive Everglades restoration, a critique and a proposal. 64 U. Miami L. Rev. 1407-1439 (2010).

Sanders, Joseph. Applying Daubert inconsistently?: proof of individual causation in toxic tort and forensic cases. 75 Brook. L. Rev. 1367-1404 (2010).

Pokladowski, Brian. The effects of the Great Lakes Compact on the water resources of Michigan. 11 J. L. Soc’y 110-137 (2009/2010).

Argue, David A. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill and seafood prices. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11111-11114 (2010).

Batker, David, et al. Gaining ground: wetlands, hurricanes, and the economy: the value of restoring the Mississippi River Delta. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11106-11110 (2010).

Binder, Denis. Lessons from the BP emergency action plan in action. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11115-11120 (2010).

Craig, Robin Kundis. The Gulf oil spill and national marine sanctuaries. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11074-11078 (2010).

Houck, Oliver A. Worst case and the Deepwater Horizon blowout: there ought to be a law. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11033-11040 (2010).

Kalen, Sam. The BP Macondo Well exploration plan: wither the Coastal Zone Management Act? 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11079-11083 (2010).

Light, Alfred R. Designing the Gulf Claims Facility in the shadow of the law: a template from the Superfund § 301(e) Report. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11121-11128 (2010).

Norse, Elliott A. and John Amos. Impacts, perception, and policy implications of the Deepwater Horizon oil and gas disaster. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11058-11073 (2010).

Presnall, Carrie, Laura López-Hoffman and Marc L. Miller. Can the Deepwater Horizon Trust take account of ecosystem services and fund restoration of the Gulf? 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11129-11131 (2010).

Simon, Jonathan and Jennifer Owen. The policy and regulatory response to Deepwater Horizon: transforming offshore oil and gas leasing? 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11084-11089 (2010).

Burns, William C.G. Belt and suspenders?: the World Heritage Convention’s role in confronting climate change. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 359-396 (2009).

Harding, Virginia M. Burnham, water, and the Plan of Chicago: a historical explanation of why water was ignored and the consequences of ignoring water. 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 413-437 (2010).

Halbrook, Stephen P. The constitutional right to hunt: new recognition of an old liberty in Virginia. 19 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 197-233 (2010).

Sing’ Oei, Abraham Korir and Jared Shepherd. ‘In land we trust’: the Endorois’ Communication and the quest for indigenous peoples’ rights in Africa. 16 Buff. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 57-111 (2010).

Malloy, James S. and John M. Sylvester. Insurance coverage for global warming liability claims. 45 Tort Trial & Ins. Prac. L.J. 811-838 (2010).

Telesetsky, Anastasia. Insurance as a mitigation mechanism: managing international greenhouse gas emissions through nationwide mandatory climate change catastrophe insurance. 27 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 691-734 (2010).

Welti, Tyler. Market sovereignty: managing the commodity of sovereign rights. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 337-366 (2009).

Tabau, Anne-Sophie and Sandrine Maljean-Dubois. Non-compliance mechanisms: interaction between the Kyoto Protocol system and the European Union. 21 Eur. J. Int’l L. 749-763 (2010).

Rourke, Jim. Note. Letters of inconsistency: Southeast Resource Recovery, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and loss of local discretion in landfill siting. (Southeast Resource Recovery, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, 595 S.E.2d 468, 2004.) 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 397-427 (2009).

Gowder, W. Andrew, Jr. and Bryan W. Wenter. Recent developments in exactions and impact fees: who pays for new schools, fair housing, and clean air? 42 Urb. Law. 615-625 (2010).

Henderson, Wesley E. Annexation in South Carolina. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 235-269 (2008).

Hirokawa, Keith H. and Ira Gonzalez. Regulating vacant property. 42 Urb. Law. 627-637 (2010).

Salkin, Patricia E. No protectable property interest in making land use decisions and other ethics in land use issues 2009-2010. 42 Urb. Law. 649-663 (2010).

Sullivan, Edward J. Recent developments in comprehensive planning law. 42 Urb. Law. 665-676 (2010).

Wilson, Paul D. and Noah C. Shaw. The judge as cartoon character whose hat flies into the air: the “shocks the conscience” standard in recent substantive due process land use litigation. 42 Urb. Law. 677-691 (2010).

Kunoy, Bjørn, Martin Heinesen and Finn Mørk. Appraisal of applicable depth constraint for the purpose of establishing the outer limits of the continental shelf. 41 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 357-379 (2010).

Dinkins, Carol E., George O. Wilkinson, Margaret E. Peloso and Thomas S. Meriwether. The role of public and private litigants in promoting environmental corporate social responsibility. 21 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 123-156 (2010).

Symposium. Environmental Lawsuits and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Litigation in Promoting Good Environmental Practice. Articles by Hope M. Babcock, Michael Barsa, David Dana, Carol E. Dinkins, George O. Wilkinson, Margaret E. Peloso, Thomas S. Meriwether, Anthony Z. Roisman (with student Alexander Wolff), Elizabeth Burleson, Diana Pei Wu and Lakshman Guruswamy. 21 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 1-237 (2010).

Chircop, Aldo. Regional cooperation in marine environmental protection in the South China Sea: a reflection on new directions for marine conservation. 41 Ocean Dev. & Int’l L. 334-356 (2010).

Freeman, Mike, Stephen Gidiere and Mary Samuels. The oil spill’s impact on Gulf Coast oysters. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11097-11099 (2010).

Klein, Natalie. Whales and tuna: the past and future of litigation between Australia and Japan. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 143-217 (2009).

Malloy, Katherine M. California’s Marine Life Protection Act: a review of the marine protected areas proposal process for the North Central Coast region. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 201-233 (2008).

Sielen, Alan. The new international rules on ocean dumping: promise and performance. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 295-336 (2009).

Keiter, Robert B. The national park system: visions for tomorrow. 50 Nat. Resources J. 71-110 (2010).

Anderson, Robert T. Indian water rights, practical reasoning, and negotiated settlements. 98 Cal. L. Rev. 1133-1163 (2010).

Coglianese, Matthew P. The importance of determining potential chronic natural resource damages from the Deepwater Horizon accident. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11100-11105 (2010).

Modernizing the NEPA Process in the Context of the Gulf Disaster. James McElfish, moderator; Monica Goldberg, Edward E. Boling and Tom Simpson, panelists. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11147-11160 (2010).

Piper, Kaitlyn, L. Note. New York’s fight over blight: the role of economic underutilization in Kaur. (Kaur v. N.Y. State Urban Dev. Corp., 2010 N.Y. LEXIS 1181, 2010.) 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1149-1195 (2010).

Racketa, Alexander D. Note. Takings for economic development in New York: a constitutional slam dunk? 20 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 191-218 (2010).

Drew, Cynthia A. The Gulf deepwater drilling moratorium litigation: while merits still pending, already significant practical effect? 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11137-11141 (2010).

Jones, Keith J. Drill baby...spill baby: how the Oil Pollution Act’s economic-damage liability cap contributed to the Deepwater Horizon disaster. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11132-11136 (2010).

Hodge, John Adams. How environmental regulators can address human factors in oil spill prevention using crew resource management. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11048-11057 (2010).

Plater, Zygmunt J.B. Learning from disasters: twenty-one years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill, will reactions to the Deepwater Horizon blowout finally address the systemic flaws revealed in Alaska? 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11041-11047 (2010).

Leshy, John D. Federal lands in the twenty-first century. 50 Nat. Resources J. 111-137 (2010).

Blumm, Michael C. The public trust doctrine and private property: the accommodation principle. 27 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 649-667 (2010).

Gardner, Royal C., Kim Diana Connolly and Abou Bamba. African wetlands of international importance: assessment of benefits associated with designations under the Ramsar Convention. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 257-294 (2009).

Dalton, Daniel. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act—recent developments. 42 Urb. Law. 561-580 (2010).

Bhushan, Prashant. Sacrificing human rights and environmental rights at the altar of “development.” 41 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 389-403 (2009).

Jans, Jan H. Stop the integration principle? 33 Fordham Int’l L.J. 1533-1547 (2010).

Nolon, John R. The law of sustainable development: keeping pace. 30 Pace L. Rev. 1246-1298 (2010).

Batchis, Wayne. Business Improvement Districts and the Constitution: the troubling necessity of privatized government for urban revitalization. 38 Hastings Const. L.Q. 91-130 (2010).

Bell, Abraham and Gideon Parchomovsky. The hidden function of takings compensation. 96 Va. L. Rev. 1673-1725 (2010).

Carter, Charles C. Oregon’s experience with property rights compensation statutes. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 137-168 (2008).

Cordes, Mark W. The fairness dimension in takings jurisprudence. 20 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 1-57 (2010).

Johnson, Emily A. Reconciling originalism and the history of the Public Use Clause. 79 Fordham L. Rev. 265-319 (2010).

Spohr, David W. “What shall we do with the drunken sailor?”: the intersection of the Takings Clause and the character, merit, or impropriety of regulatory action. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 1-93 (2008).

Thomas, Robert H. Recent developments in challenging the right to take in eminent domain. 42 Urb. Law. 693-712 (2010).

Wade, William W. Penn Central’s ad hocery yields inconsistent takings decisions. 42 Urb. Law. 549-560 (2010).

Abbot, Carolyn and David Booton. Using patent law’s teaching function to introduce an environmental ethic into the process of technical innovation. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 219-255 (2009).

Roisman, Anthony Z. and student Alexander Wolff. Trespass by pollution: remedy by mandatory injunction. 21 Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 157-191 (2010).

Buchanan, Sariyah S. Why marginalized communities should use community benefit agreements as a tool for environmental justice: urban renewal and brownfield redevelopment in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 29 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 31-51 (2010).

Neuman, Janet. Are we there yet? Weary travelers on the long road to water policy reform. 50 Nat. Resources J. 139-166 (2010).

Weeks, Amber L. Defining the public interest: administrative narrowing and broadening of the public interest in response to the statutory silence of water codes. 50 Nat. Resources J. 255-289 (2010).

Abrams, Robert H. and Noah D. Hall. Framing water policy in a carbon affected and carbon constrained environment. 50 Nat. Resources J. 3-70 (2010).

Hardy, Steven K. An analysis of Georgia Senate Resolution 107: the need for additional reservoirs in north Georgia. 17 Southeastern Envtl. L.J. 457-479 (2009).

Anderson, Christopher J., Catherine Artis and Jacob Pendergrass. Prospects for wetland recovery in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. 40 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11090-11096 (2010).

Lat, Tanya Karina A. Note. Testing the limits of GATT Art. XX(b): toxic waste trade, Japan’s economic partnership agreements, and the WTO. 21 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 367-393 (2009).

McKenzie, Michael. Emissions reduction policies and the World Trade Organization. 13 Asia Pac. J. Envtl. L. 61-73 (2010).

No comments: