Brown, Kimberly N. Government by contract and the structural Constitution. 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 491-535 (2011).
Conrad, Daniel H. Filling the
gap: the retroactive effect of vacating
agency regulations. 29 Pace Envtl. L.
Rev. 1-41 (2011).
Michael, Kristin R. Note. Mercury rising? Fifth Circuit applies administrative laws
retroactively deep in the heart of Texas.
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. Sandy Creek
Energy Assoc., L.P., 627 F.3d 134, 2010.)
18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 552-569 (2011).
Vaughn, Robert G. Transparency
in the administration of laws: the
relationship between differing justifications for transparency and differing
views of administrative law. 26 Am. U.
Int’l L. Rev. 969-982 (2011).
AGRICULTURE.
Ackerman, Amy S. Buy healthy,
buy local: an analysis of potential
legal challenges to state and local government local purchase preferences. 43 Urb. Law. 1015-1034 (2011).
Lessing, Ariele. A supplemental
labeling regime for organic products:
how the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act hampers a market solution to an
organic transparency problem. 18 Mo.
Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 415-478 (2011).
Martin, David A. Note. Crying over spilt milk: a closer look at required disclosures and the
organic milk industry. (International Dairy Foods Association v.
Boggs, 622 F.3d 628, 2010.) 18 Mo.
Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 524-551 (2011).
Pearce, James I. Note. A brave new Jungle: factory farming and advocacy in the
twenty-first century. 21 Duke Envtl. L.
& Pol’y F. 433-467 (2011).
AIR
POLLUTION.
Hodson, Kenneth A. The challenge
of sustainable air quality regulation in Maricopa County after the economic
tide has gone out from the perspective of the regulated community. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 783-790 (2011).
ALTERNATIVE
ENERGY.
Diamond, Kimberly E. and Ellen J. Crivella. Wind turbine wakes, wake effect impacts, and
wind leases: using solar access laws as
the model for capitalizing on wind rights during the evolution of wind policy
standards. 22 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y
F. 195-244 (2011).
Ferrey, Steven. Threading the
constitutional needle with care: the
Commerce Clause threat to the new infrastructure of renewable power. 7 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 59-123
(2011-2012).
Paalborg, Alexander R.
Note. West Virginia’s Alternative
and Renewable Energy Portfolio Act: the
“Mountain State’s” last attempt to quit its addiction to coal. 6 Pitt. J. Envtl. L. & Pub. Health L.
109-147 (2011).
Williamson, Jeremiah I. The
future of U.S. geothermal development:
alternative energy or green pipe dream?
7 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L. 1-29 (2011-2012).
Zaidi, Kamaal R. Environmental
mitigation aspects of water resources in geothermal development: using a comparative approach in building a
law and policy framework for more sustainable water management practices in
Canada. 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev.
97-144 (2010).
ALTERNATIVE
FUELS.
Feld, Danielle Spiegel. Ensuring
that imported biofuels abide by domestic environmental standards: will the Agreement on Technical Barriers to
Trade tolerate asymmetrical compliance regimes?
29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 79-120 (2011).
ANIMAL
LAW.
Wakefield, Isaac P.
Comment. Drop dead stylish: mitigating environmental impact of fur
production through consumer protection in the Truth in Fur Labeling Act of
2010. 19 Penn St. Envtl. L. Rev. 267-286
(2011).
ARCHITECTURE.
Malina, Cathreine. Note. Up on the roof: implementing local government policies to
promote and achieve the environmental, social, and economic benefits of green
roof technology. 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L.
Rev. 437-463 (2011).
ARCTIC.
Cafasso, Cerissa. Note. The final frontier: domestic and international environmental
remedies to preserve and protect St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 145-163 (2010).
Sternheim, Michael. Comment. Regulating the Northwest Passage. 10 Loy. Mar. L.J. 173-212 (2011).
BOOK
REVIEWS.
Bidgood, Jessica. Book
note. (Reviewing Charles Fishman, The
Big Thirst.) 15 U. Denv. Water L.
Rev. 161-163 (2011).
Cowan, Gregory. Book note. (Reviewing Steven Solomon, Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power, and
Civilization.) 15 U. Denv. Water L.
Rev. 167-172 (2011).
Salkin, Patricia E. Book
review. (Reviewing David L. Callies, Regulating
Paradise: Land Use Controls in Hawa’i,
2d ed.) 43 Urb. Law. 1107-1109 (2011).
Varty, Johna. Book note. (Reviewing Alex Prud’Homme, The Ripple
Effect: The Fate of Freshwater in the
Twenty-First Century.) 15 U. Denv.
Water L. Rev. 163-166 (2011).
BROWNFIELDS.
Yacovone, Krista. Note. Brownfields and the poor: is cleanup a hazardous waste of time? An analysis of the United States’ efforts at
remediation and their applicability to Brazil.
35 Fordham Int’l L.J. 201-247 (2011).
CERCLA.
Vogt, Katherine E. Note. Do polluters truly pay? A chip in the “potentially responsible
parties” analysis for hazardous waste cleanup.
(Celanese Corporation v. Martin
K. Eby Construction Company, Inc., 620 F.3d 529, 2010.) 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 570-587
(2011).
CHINA.
Jeffery, Michael I. and Gao Qi.
The development of payments for ecosystem services in China: cutting through the cloud of confusion over
China’s eco-compensation. 42 Envtl. L.
Rep. News & Analysis 10041-10056 (2012).
CLEAN
AIR ACT.
Buente, David T., Jr., William E. Gerard and Joel F. Visser. Limited oversight: the role of the federal courts vis-à-vis the Environmental Protection
Agency in air pollution control under the Clean Air Act. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 309-345
(2011).
Clean Air Symposium.
Introduction by Patrick J. Paul; articles by Albert H. Acken, Matthew G.
Bingham, Daniel Bodansky, Edward Z. Fox, Matthew P. Fraser, Joy Herr-Cardillo,
Eric L. Hiser, Kenneth A. Hodson, Gary E. Marchant, Matthew McDonnell, Kirsten
Engel, Ardeth Barnhart, Joseph P. Mikitish, Douglas K. Miller, Patrick J. Paul,
Christopher P. Colyer, Arnold W. Reitze, Jr. and William D. Wiley. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 665-949 (2011).
CLEAN
WATER ACT.
Glaze, Richard E. Jr. Rapanos guidance III: “waters” revisited. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis
10118-10130 (2012).
CLIMATE
CHANGE.
Bodansky, Daniel. A tale of two
architectures: the once and future U.N.
climate change regime. 43 Ariz. St. L.J.
697-712 (2011).
Gagain, Michael. Climate change,
sea level rise, and artificial islands:
saving the Maldives’ statehood and maritime claims through the
‘constitution of the oceans.’ 23 Colo.
J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 77-120 (2012).
Hsu, Shi-Ling. A game-theoretic
model of international climate change negotiations. 19 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 14-86 (2011).
Spence, Samara. Note. Three structural changes for a new system of
international climate change mitigation agreements based on the WTO model. 44 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 1415-1455 (2011).
COASTAL
AREAS.
Byrne, J. Peter. Stop the Stop the Beach plurality! 38 Ecology L.Q. 619-637 (2011).
COST/BENEFIT
ANALYSIS.
Livermore, Michael A. Can
cost-benefit analysis of environmental policy go global? 19 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 146-193 (2011).
Shapiro, Sidney A. Cost-benefit
analysis: an organizational design
perspective. 19 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J.
194-224 (2011).
CRIMINAL
LAW.
Ferguson, Ashley. Comment. We’re victims, too!: the need for greater protection of
environmental crime victims under the Crime Victims Rights Act. 19 Penn St. Envtl. L. Rev. 287-310 (2011).
The prosecution of environmental crimes in Oregon: an interview with Attorney General John
Kroger. 26 J. Envtl. L. & Litig.
493-508 (2011).
ECONOMICS.
Cooley, David and Lydia Olander.
Stacking ecosystem services payments:
risks and solutions. 42 Envtl. L.
Rep. News & Analysis 10150-10165 (2012).
EMISSIONS
TRADING.
Hamilton, Sophia. Student
article. When scientific palmers make
policy: the impact and future of
cap-and-trade in the United States. 4 J.
Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 269-318 (2011).
ENERGY
LAW.
McAnelly, W. James III, et al.
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy
law. 7 Tex. J. Oil Gas & Energy L.
125-176 (2011-2012).
ENERGY
POLICY.
Aldy, Joseph E. Promoting clean
energy in the American power sector: a
proposal for a national clean energy standard.
42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10131-10149 (2012).
Acken, Albert H. and Matthew G. Bingham. Sustainable energy in Arizona. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 669-695 (2011).
McDonnell, Matthew, Kirsten Engel and Ardeth Barnhart. The potential and power of renewable energy
credits to enhance air quality and economic development in Arizona. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 809-834 (2011).
ENVIRONMENTAL
ACTIVISM.
Jampolsky, Jacquelyn Amour.
Note. Activism is the new
black! Demonstrating the benefits of international
celebrity activism through James Cameron’s campaign against the Belo Monte
Dam. 23 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. &
Pol’y 227-256 (2012).
ENVIRONMENTAL
LAW.
Nelson, Douglas T., et al. Real
environmental protection: not a paper
exercise. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News &
Analysis 10166-10171 (2012).
Recent developments. In the
Congress. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News &
Analysis 10172-10174 (2012).
Recent developments. In the courts. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis
10175-10176 (2012).
Recent developments. In the
federal agencies. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News
& Analysis 10176-10179 (2012).
Recent developments. In the
state agencies. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News
& Analysis 10180-10183 (2012).
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY.
Andrews, Richard N.L. The EPA at
40: an historical perspective. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 223-258
(2011).Carley, Sanya, Natalie Messer Betts and John D. Graham. Innovation in the auto industry: the role of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 367-399 (2011).
Goldstein, Bernard D., MD. EPA
at 40: reflections on the Office of
Research and Development. 21 Duke Envtl.
L. & Pol’y F. 295-308 (2011).
Live Fast, Die Young: The EPA in
the Age of Aquarius. Keynote address
Lisa Heinzerling; articles by Shi-Ling Hsu, Mitchell A. Kane, Michael A.
Livermore and Sidney A. Shapiro. 19
N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 1-224 (2011).
Schoenbrod, David. How REINS
would improve environmental protection.
21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 347-365 (2011).
Symposium: The EPA at 40. Articles by William K. Reilly, Richard N.L. Andrews, Linda S. Birnbaum, Paul Jung, Sheila A. Newton, Bernard D. Goldstein, MD, David T. Buente, Jr., William E. Gerard, Joel F. Visser, David Schoenbrod, Sanya Carley, Natalie Messer Betts, John D. Graham, Michael P. Vandenbergh and Jonathan A. Gilligan. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 207-431 (2011).
EUROPEAN
UNION.
Carson, Trevor E. Comment. The decision from the Court of First Instance
that destroyed the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. 23 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J.
157-185 (2010).
FEDERALISM.
Gutherz, Ilan W. Comment. Cap and trade meets the Interstate Commerce
Clause: are greenhouse gas regulations
constitutional after Lopez and Morrison? 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 289-320 (2011).
FISHERIES.
Kato, Dawn M. Comment. Battle for bluefin: the consumer’s role in preserving the
Atlantic bluefin tuna. 42 Cal. W. Int’l
L.J. 149-188 (2011).
FORESTS.
Barresi, Paul A. Mobilizing the
public trust doctrine in support of publicly owned forests as carbon dioxide
sinks in India and the United States. 23
Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 39-75 (2012).
GENETIC
MODIFICATION.
Faure, Michael and Andri
Wibisana. Liability for damage caused by
GMOs: an economic perspective. 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 1-69 (2010).
GLOBAL
WARMING.
Barriger, Lisa. Comment. Global warming and viticulture: the ability of wine regions to adapt in
differing regulatory schemes. 19 Penn
St. Envtl. L. Rev. 311-332 (2011).
GREENHOUSE
GASES.
Abend, Katherine A. Note. Deploying carbon capture and storage in
developing countries: risks and
opportunities. 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L.
Rev. 397-419 (2011).
Gresham, R. Lee and Owen L. Anderson.
Legal and commercial models for pore-space access and use for geologic
CO2 sequestration. 72 U.
Pitt. L. Rev. 701-777 (2011).
Johnson, Jon. Striving for
greenhouse gas mitigation and energy independence in Pennsylvania. 6 Pitt. J. Envtl. L. & Pub. Health L.
41-83 (2011).
HERITAGE
SITES.
Litton, Sam. Note. The World Heritage “In Danger” Listing as a
taking. 44 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol.
219-265 (2011).
HISTORY.
Houck, Oliver A. Save Ourselves: the environmental case that changed
Louisiana. 72 La. L. Rev. 409-442
(2012).
HUDSON
RIVER.
Runnels, Michael B. and Andrea Giampetro-Meyer. Cooperative NRDA & new governance: getting to restoration in the Hudson River,
the Gulf of Mexico, and beyond. 77
Brook. L. Rev. 107-149 (2011).
INTERNATIONAL
LAW.
Allen, Linda J. The North
American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation: has it fulfilled its promises and
potential? An empirical study of
policy. 23 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L.
& Pol’y 121-199 (2012).
Sawyer, Jessica M. and Sarah C. Sawyer.
Lessons from the mist: what can international
environmental law learn from gorilla conservation efforts? 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 365-396 (2011).
INTERNATIONAL
TRADE.
Brooks, Travis A. Comment. Towards promises unfulfilled: applying sixteen years of trade and
environmental lessons to the pending U.S.—Columbia Trade Promotion
Agreement. 23 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus.
& Dev. L.J. 339-368 (2011).
LAND
USE.
Hughes, Heather. Securitization
and suburbia. 90 Or. L. Rev. 359-411
(2011).
Rule, Troy A. Airspace in a
green economy. 59 UCLA L. Rev. 270-320
(2011).
Sullivan, Edward and Alexia Solomou.
Alternative dispute resolution in land use disputes—two continents and
two approaches. 43 Urb. Law. 1035-1059
(2011).
Wolf, Michael Allan. A yellow
light for “green zoning”: some words of
caution about incorporating green building standards into local land use law. 43 Urb. Law. 949-975 (2011).
LAW
OF THE SEA.
Hodnette, Jonathan D.
Comment. Substantial nexus: harmony after years of situs and status
discrepancies on the spectrum of Outer Countinental Shelf Lands Act
compensation claims. 10 Loy. Mar. L.J.
115-143 (2011).
LEGAL
PROCESS.
Tettlebaum, Benjamin W.
Note. “Vacation” at the farm: why courts should not extend “remand without
vacation” to environmental deregulation.
(Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed
Farms, 130 S. Ct. 2743, 2010.) 97
Cornell L. Rev. 405-432 (2012).
MILITARY.
Gillespie, Alexander. The limits
of international environmental law:
military necessity v. conservation.
23 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1-38 (2012).
NATIVE
AMERICAN LANDS.
Kloeckner, Jane. Hold on to that
tribal sovereignty: establishing tribal
pesticide programs that recognize inherent tribal authority and promote
federal-tribal partnerships. 42 Envtl.
L. Rep. News & Analysis 10057-10077 (2012).
Lowrey, Jessica. Note. Home sweet home: how the ‘purpose of the reservation’ affects
more than just the quantity of Indian water rights. 23 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y
201-225 (2012).
Matson, Jeffrey T. Student
article. Postjudgment “water
interest”: lifting the headgate to let
appropriate compensation flow for unlawful diversions. 15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 135-160 (2011).
Miller, Douglas K. Visibility
issues in rural Arizona and Indian Country.
43 Ariz. St. L.J. 861-877 (2011).
NATURAL
GAS.
Argetsinger, Beren.
Comment. The Marcellus
Shale: bridge to a clean energy future
or bridge to nowhere? Environmental,
energy and climate policy considerations for shale gas development in New York
State. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 321-343
(2011).
Bagnell, Nicolle R. Snyder.
Environmental regulation impacting Marcellus Shale development. 19 Penn St. Envtl. L. Rev. 177-192 (2011).
Developing the Law of the Marcellus Shale. Articles by Ross H. Pifer, Kevin C. Abbott, Nicole R. Snyder Bagnell, David E. Pierce, R. Lee Gresham and Owen L. Anderson. 72 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 615-777 (2011).
Marcellus Shale Law and Policy Symposium. Articles by Nicolle R. Snyder Bagnell,
Patrick C. McGinley and David E. Pierce.
19 Penn St. Envtl. L. Rev. 177-265 (2011).
Turgeon, Elizabeth. Recent
development. “Goin’ to Carolina in my
mind:” prospects and perils for natural
gas drilling in North Carolina. 13 N.C.
J.L. & Tech. 147-181 (2011).
NEPA.
Friel, Joshua K. Note. Secular vs. sacred: NEPA again proves to be an ineffective tool
to protect sacred land. (Pit River Tribe, et al. v. United States
Forest Service, et al., 615 F.3d 1069, 2010.) 18 Mo. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev. 504-523
(2011).
NONINDIGENOUS
SPECIES.
Strifling, David A. An
ecosystem-based approach to slowing the synergistic effects of invasive species
and climate change. 22 Duke Envtl. L.
& Pol’y F. 145-193 (2011).
NUCLEAR
WASTE.
Abbott, Mark A. Note. Waste not, want not: low-level radioactive waste and the United
States’ need for a revised system of disposal.
(EnergySolutions, LLC v. Utah,
625 F.3d 1261, 2010.) 18 Mo. Envtl. L.
& Pol’y Rev. 479-503 (2011).
Rodgers, Kerry E. Identifying
the crucial elements of states’ collaboration over the long haul: the transportation of nuclear waste to New
Mexico. 41 N.M. L. Rev. 361-405 (2011).
PETROLEUM
INDUSTRY.
Blades, Bryan W. Production,
politics, and pre-salt: transitioning to
a PSC regime in Brazil. 7 Tex. J. Oil
Gas & Energy L. 31-57 (2011-2012).
Orth, Derek. Comment. Administering America’s offshore oil
fields: how fewer, performance-based
regulations can produce better results.
26 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 509-534 (2011).
RISK
ANALYSIS.
Vandenbergh, Michael P. and Jonathan A. Gilligan. Macro-risks:
the challenge for rational risk regulation. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 401-431 (2011).
SCIENCE.
Birnbaum, Linda S., Paul Jung and Sheila A. Newton. Environmental health science for regulatory
decisionmaking. 21 Duke Envtl. L. &
Pol’y F. 259-293 (2011).
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT.
Alam, Shawkat and Md. Saiful Karim.
Linkages of development and environment:
in search of an integrated approach through sustainable
development. 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L.
Rev. 345-363 (2011).
TAKINGS.
Fein, Ian. Note. Why judicial takings are unripe. 38 Ecology L.Q. 749-795 (2011).
13th Annual Conference on Litigating Regulatory Takings Challenges to
Land Use and Environmental Regulations.
Articles by J. Peter Byrne, John D. Echeverria, Cecilia Fex, Marc
Mihaly, Turner Smith, R.S. Radford and Luke A. Wake. 38 Ecology L.Q. 619-748 (2011).
Lewyn, Michael. Character counts: the “character of the government action” in
regulatory takings actions. 40 Seton
Hall L. Rev. 597-637 (2010).
McGinley, Patrick C. Regulatory
takings in the shale gas patch. 19 Penn
St. Envtl. L. Rev. 193-240 (2011).
Mihaly, Marc and Turner Smith. Kelo’s trail: a survey of state and federal legislative and judicial activity five years later. 38 Ecology L.Q. 703-729 (2011).
Patashnik, Josh. Note. Bringing a judicial takings claim. (Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Fla. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 130 S. Ct. 2592, 2010.) 64 Stan. L. Rev. 255-288 (2012).
Radford, R.S. and Luke A. Wake.
Deciphering and extrapolating:
searching for sense in Penn
Central. 38 Ecology L.Q. 731-748
(2011).
TAXATION.
Kane, Mitchell A. Taxation and
multi-period global cap and trade. 19
N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 87-145 (2011).
TORTS.
Faulk, Richard O. and John S. Gray.
Public nuisance at the crossroads:
policing the intersection between statutory primacy and common law. 15 Chapman L. Rev. 495-535 (2012).TOXICS.
TSCA Reform: Hazard, Use, and Exposure Data. Linda Breggin, moderator; Connie Deford, Mary Marrero and Daniel Rosenberg, panelists. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10109-10117 (2012).
TRAILS.
Fex, Cecilia. The elements of
liability in a Trails Act taking: a
guide to the analysis. 38 Ecology L.Q.
673-701 (2011).
TRANSPORTATION.
Growchow, Kevin J. Comment. California high-speed rail on track? Bridging the gap between competing land use
issues with the California high-speed rail project. (Town
of Atherton v. Cal. High-Speed Rail Auth., No. 34-2008-80000022, slip op.
at 21.) 15 Chapman L. Rev. 585-612
(2012).
URBAN
ENVIRONMENT.
Foster, Sheila R. Collective
action and the urban commons. 87 Notre
Dame L. Rev. 57-133 (2011).
WATER
LAW.
Baker, David W. Case note. Future of ditch-wide change cases in
Colorado: reducing per-share water
quantities with historical consumptive use determinations based on unlawful
enlargement and average reservoir releases: ... (Burlington Ditch Reservoir & Land Co. v. Metro Wastewater
Reclamation Dist., 256 P.3d 645, 2011.)
15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 173-188 (2011).
The Colorado Water Conservation Board Conference Report. 15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 203-204 (2011).
A Detailed Analysis of the Water Transfers Framework in Three Colorado
River Basin States. Introduction by
Jennifer Pitt; articles by Dean Waters Price, Suzanne Lieberman and Johanna
Hamburger. 15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev.
1-103 (2011).
Elliott, Heather. Alabama’s
water crisis. 63 Ala. L. Rev. 383-406
(2012).
Hamburger, Johanna. Improving
efficiency and overcoming obstacles to water transfers in Utah. 15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 69-103 (2011).
Howard, Derrick. The appearance
of solidity: legal implementation of the
human right to water in the United States.
11 Appalachian J.L. 123-155 (2011).
Lieberman, Suzanne. Water
organizations in Colorado: a first look
into water organizations’ control of agricultural water rights and their
transfer potential in the Colorado River Basin.
15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 31-67 (2011).
Norris, Joe. Case note. Montana
v. Wyoming: is water conservation
drowning the Yellowstone River Compact?
(Montana v. Wyoming, 131 S.
Ct. 1765, 2011.) 15 U. Denv. Water L.
Rev. 189-202 (2011).
Pitt, Jennifer.
Introduction: the legal framework
for water transfers in the Colorado River Basin will be important. 15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 1-4 (2011).
WATER
RESOURCES.
Harris, Luke W. and Christopher J. Sanchez. Considerations for analyzing Colorado ground
water: a technical perspective. 15 U. Denv. Water L. Rev. 105-134 (2011).
Masters, Lindsay B. Note. Free market environmentalism: desalination as a solution to limited water
resources in Northern Chile’s mining industry.
23 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y 257-283 (2012).
WETLANDS.
Brandao, Sam. Comment. Louisiana’s Mono Lake: the public trust
doctrine and oil company liability for Louisiana’s vanishing wetlands. 86 Tul. L. Rev. 759-785 (2012).
WHALING.
Moffa, Anthony L.I. Comment. Two
competing models of activism, one goal:
a case study of anti-whaling campaigns in the Southern Ocean. 37 Yale J. Int’l L. 201-214 (2012).
WORLD
TRADE ORGANIZATION.
Werge, Thomas. Environmental
standards under the Peru FTA: a template
for the WTO? 23 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L.
Rev. 71-95 (2010).
ZONING.
Addes, Kirah. Note. The fate of affordable housing legislation in
New Jersey: how Governor Christie’s
proposed S-1 legislation threatens to undo the New Jersey Supreme Court
decisions in Mount Laurel I and Mount Laurel II. (Southern
Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (Mount Laurel I), 336
A.2d 713, 1975; Southern Burlington
County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (Mount Laurel II), 456 A.2d 390,
1983.) 36 Seton Hall Legis. J. 82-105
(2011).
Himebaugh, Daniel A. Tie goes to
the landowner: ambiguous zoning
ordinances and the strict construction rule.
43 Urb. Law. 1061-1083 (2011).
Norton, Richard K. Who decides,
how, and why? Planning for the judicial
review of local legislative zoning decisions.
43 Urb. Law. 1085-1105 (2011).
