ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.
Blumenauer, Rep. Earl. Beyond the backlash: using performance-based regulations to produce results through innovation. 26 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 351-366 (2011).
Conrad, Daniel H. Filling the gap: the retroactive effect of vacating agency regulations. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 1-41 (2011).
Criddle, Evan J. When delegation begets domination: due process of administrative lawmaking. 46 Ga. L. Rev. 117-212 (2011).
Harris, Michael Ray. Breaking the grip of the administrative triad: agency policy making under a necessity-based doctrine. 86 Tul. L. Rev. 273-308 (2011).
Owen, Dave. Critical habitat and the challenge of regulating small harms. 64 Fla. L. Rev. 141-199 (2012).
Seidenfeld, Mark. Substituting substantive for procedural review of guidance documents. 90 Tex. L. Rev. 331-394 (2011).
Vacca, Ryan. Acting like an administrative agency: the Federal Circuit en banc. 76 Mo. L. Rev. 733-762 (2011).
AGRICULTURE.
Adler, Robert W. Balancing compassion and risk in climate adaptation: U.S. water, drought, and agricultural law. 64 Fla. L. Rev. 201-267 (2012).
Bleshman, Rachel. Note. National Pork Producers Council v. U.S. EPA: striking down Clean Water Act rule for factory farms, the Fifth Circuit strips the EPA of effective regulatory power. (Nat’l Pork Producers Council v. U.S. EPA, 635 F.3d 738, 2011.) 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 207-219 (2011).
Chrostek, Garrett. Note. A critique of Vermont’s right-to-farm law and proposals for better protecting the state’s agricultural future. 36 Vt. L. Rev. 233-259 (2011).
Di Camillo, Nicole G. Comment. Methane digesters and biogas recovery—masking the environmental consequences of industrial concentrated livestock production. 29 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 365-394 (2011).
Kelly, Dana. Student article. Bringing the green to green: would the legalization of marijuana in California prevent the environmental destruction caused by illegal farms? 18 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 95-118 (2012).
Norris, Patricia, Gary Taylor and Mark Wyckoff. When urban agriculture meets Michigan’s Right to Farm Act: the pig’s in the parlor. 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev. 365-404.
Slating, Timothy A. and Jay P. Kesan. Making regulatory innovation keep pace with technological innovation. 2011 Wis. L. Rev. 1109-1179.
Tettlebaum, Benjamin W. Note. “Vacation” at the farm: why courts should not extend “remand without vacation” to environmental deregulation. (Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 130 S. Ct. 2743, 2010.) 97 Cornell L. Rev. 405-432 (2012).
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY.
Acken, Albert H. and Matthew G. Bingham. Sustainable energy in Arizona. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 669-695 (2011).
Bailey, Kristin L. Note. Insecurity for community solar: three strategies to confront an emerging tension between renewable energy investment and federal securities laws. 10 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 123-146 (2012).
McIntyre, Siobhan and Timothy P. Duane. Water, work, wildlife, and wilderness: the collaborative federal public lands planning framework for utility-scale solar energy development in the desert Southwest. 41 Envtl. L. 1093-1190 (2011).
Miller, Douglas K. Visibility issues in rural Arizona and Indian Country. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 861-877 (2011).
Rule, Troy A. Airspace in a green economy. 59 UCLA L. Rev. 270-320 (2011).
ALTERNATIVE FUELS.
Feld, Danielle Spiegel. Ensuring that imported biofuels abide by domestic environmental standards: will the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade tolerate asymmetrical compliance regimes? 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 79-120 (2011).
Keske, Catherine M.H. How lawsuits could ignite an energy market: the case of anaerobic digestion. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11094-11100 (2011).
ANIMAL LAW.
Braverman, Irus. Zoo registrars: a bewildering bureaucracy. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 165-206 (2010).
Shafer, Meredith L. Casenote. Perplexing precedent: United States v. Stevens confounds a century of Supreme Court conventionalism and redefines the limits of “entertainment.” (United States v. Stevens, 130 S. Ct. 1577, 2010.) 19 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 281-342 (2012).
AUTOMOBILES.
Hall, Laura. Note. The evolution of CAFE standards: fuel economy regulation enters its second act. 39 Transp. L.J. 1-29 (2011).
AVIATION.
Wyatt, Timothy R. Balancing airport capacity requirements with environmental concerns: legal challenges to airport expansion. 76 J. Air L. & Com. 733-804 (2011).
BANKRUPTCY.
Blair, Scott E. Note. Toxic assets: the EPA’s settlement of CERCLA claims in bankruptcy. 86 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1941-1988 (2011).
Dow, Christopher. Treatment of CERCLA claims for hazardous waste cleanup costs in bankruptcy. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11091-11093 (2011).
BIODIVERSITY.
Fischer, William M. Note. The Utah Bioprospecting Act of 2010: (unintentional) state-level implementation of the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity. 10 J. on Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 197-226 (2012).
BOOK REVIEWS.
Blumm, Michael. The real story behind the Columbia Basin salmon debacle: dam preservation under the Endangered Species Act. (Reviewing Steven Hawley, Recovering a Lost River: Removing Dams, Rewilding Salmon, Revitalizing Communities.) 41 Envtl. L. 1363-1369 (2011).
Lewyn, Michael. How suburbia happened in Toronto. (Reviewing John Sewell, The Shape of the Suburbs: Understanding Toronto’s Sprawl.) 6 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 299-311 (2011).
BROWNFIELDS.
Slavich, John. As if it isn’t enough to have a non-performing loan: dealing with environmentally impacted distressed assets. 41 Tex. Envtl. L.J. 29-46 (2010).
CERCLA.
Joyner, Sean H. Note. Superfund to the rescue? Seeking potential CERCLA response authority and cost recovery liability for releases of hazardous substances resulting from hydraulic fracturing. 28 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol’y 111-143 (2011).
Kilbert, Kenneth K. Neither joint nor several: orphan shares and private CERCLA actions. 41 Envtl. L. 1045-1092 (2011).
CHINA.
Deng, Annie. Note. Dousing the flames: the Tang Fuzhen self-immolation incident and urban land takings reform in the People’s Republic of China. 20 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 585-616 (2011).
Jeffery, Michael I. and Gao Qi. The development of payments for ecosystem services in China: cutting through the cloud of confusion over China’s eco-compensation. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10041-10056 (2012).
Kelley, Jason E. Comment. Seeking justice for pollution victims in China: why China should amend the Tort Liability Law to allow punitive damages in environmental tort cases. 35 Seattle U. L. Rev. 527-557 (2012).
Noble, Jarrett. Comment. Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 355-377 (2010).
CLEAN AIR ACT.
Brenner, Robert, et al. Recent air regulations: what picture will the jigsaw pieces create? 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10005-10016 (2012).
Clean Air Symposium. Introduction by Patrick J. Paul; articles by Albert H. Acken, Matthew G. Bingham, Daniel Bodansky, Edward Z. Fox, Matthew P. Fraser, Joy Herr-Cardillo, Eric L. Hiser, Kenneth A. Hodson, Gary E. Marchant, Matthew McDonnell, Kirsten Engel, Ardeth Barnhart, Joseph P. Mikitish, Douglas K. Miller, Patrick J. Paul, Christopher P. Colyer, Arnold W. Reitze, Jr. and William D. Wiley. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 665-949 (2011).
Eisenstat, Fredric. Note. American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut: how one less legal theory available in the effort to curb emissions is actually one step forward for the cause. (Am. Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut, 131 S. Ct. 2527, 2011.) 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 221-230 (2011).
Reitze, Arnold W., Jr. The intersection of climate change and Clean Air Act stationary source programs. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 901-942 (2011).
Stensvaag, John-Mark. Preventing significant deterioration under the Clean Air Act: the BACT determination—part I. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11101-11117 (2011).
Stensvaag, John-Mark. Preventing significant deterioration under the Clean Air Act: the BACT determination—part II. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10024-10040 (2012).
White, Teal Jordan. Comment. Clean Air Act mayhem: the EPA’s Tailoring Rule stitches greenhouse gas emissions into the wrong regulatory fitting. 18 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 407-442 (2011).
CLEAN WATER ACT.
Antony, Anil J. Shotguns, spray, and smoke: regulating atmospheric deposition of pollutants under the Clean Water Act. 29 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 215-268 (2011).
Bleshman, Rachel. Note. National Pork Producers Council v. U.S. EPA: striking down Clean Water Act rule for factory farms, the Fifth Circuit strips the EPA of effective regulatory power. (Nat’l Pork Producers Council v. U.S. EPA, 635 F.3d 738, 2011.) 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 207-219 (2011).
Devine, Jon, et al. The intended scope of Clean Water Act jurisdiction. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11118-11126 (2011).
Rapp, Jason. Coal and water: reclaiming the Clean Water Act for environmental protection. 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 99-154 (2011).
CLIMATE CHANGE.
Climate Change Special Issue. Introduction by Lisa Heinzerling; articles by Dave Markell, J.B. Ruhl, Sarah Krakoff, Dave Owen, Robert W. Adler and Victor B. Flatt; case comment by Allison Fischman. 64 Fla. L. Rev. 1-304 (2012).
Gremillion, Thomas M. Setting the foundation: climate change adaptation at the local level. 41 Envtl. L. 1221-1253 (2011).
Rice, Brooks V. Comment. The “triumph” of the commons: an analysis of enforcement problems and solutions in the Western Climate Initiative. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 401-433 (2010).
Spence, Samara. Note. Three structural changes for a new system of international climate change mitigation agreements based on the WTO model. 44 Vand. J. Transnat’l L. 1415-1455 (2011).
COAL.
Morgan, Jessica. Comment. Preventing coal companies from using compliance schedules to loophole around the mountains. 41 Envtl. L. 1295-1332 (2011).
COMPARATIVE LAW.
Blomquist, Robert F. The logic and limits of environmental criminal law in the global setting: Brazil and the United States—comparisons, contrasts, and questions in search of a robust theory. 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 83-98 (2011).
Jeffery, Michael I. Climate change mitigation and adaptation policy options: reducing Australia’s dependence on coal, natural gas, and other nonrenewable energy resources. 21 Ind. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 447-480 (2011).
de Paula Domingos, Nicole. The interface between climate change and trade regimes through the eyes of Brazil. 6 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 239-255 (2011).
Rieu-Clarke, Alistair and Geoffrey Gooch. Governing the tributaries of the Mekong—the contribution of international law and institutions to enhancing equitable cooperation over the Sesan. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 193-224 (2010).
Sand, Peter H. The right to know: freedom of environmental information in comparative and international law. 20 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 203-232 (2011).
CORPORATIONS.
Cortemeglia, Cheryl. Note. Sarei v. Rio Tinto: how an exhaustion requirement for the Alien Tort Statute will further exhaust remedies for environmental injuries. (Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC, 550 F.3d 822, 2008.) 26 Md. J. Int’l L. 193-238 (2011).
Pearse, Adam. Note. John Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobil Corp.: the D.C. Circuit affirms corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute. (Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 654 F.3d 11, 2011.) 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 231-250 (2011).
COURTS.
Markell, Dave and J.B. Ruhl. An empirical assessment of climate change in the courts: a new jurisprudence or business as usual? 64 Fla. L. Rev. 15-86 (2012).
CRIMINAL LAW.
Davidson, Justin M. Comment. Polluting without consequence: how BP and other large government contractors evade suspension and debarment for environmental crime and misconduct. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 257-288 (2011).
The prosecution of environmental crimes in Oregon: an interview with Attorney General John Kroger. 26 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 493-508 (2011).
DISPUTE RESOLUTION.
Aladjem, David. Recycling the process: collaborative interest-based negotiations in an era of climate change. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 285-299 (2010).
ECONOMICS.
Burleson, Elizabeth. From Coase to collaborative property decision-making: green economy innovation. 14 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 79-136 (2011).
Kuperman, Zachary D. Note. Cutting the baby in half: an economic critique of indivisible resource partition. 77 Brook. L. Rev. 263-301 (2011).
EMISSIONS TRADING.
Carson, Trevor E. Comment. The decision from the Court of First Instance that destroyed the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. 23 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 157-185 (2010).
Gutherz, Ilan W. Comment. Cap and trade meets the Interstate Commerce Clause: are greenhouse gas regulations constitutional after Lopez and Morrison? 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 289-320 (2011).
Hamilton, Sophia. Student article. When scientific palmers make policy: the impact and future of cap-and-trade in the United States. 4 J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L. 269-318 (2011).
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT.
Rylander, Jason C. Recovering endangered species in difficult times: can the ESA go beyond mere salvage? 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10017-10023 (2012).
ENERGY INDUSTRY.
Ellerbe, William H. Note. Toward legitimacy through collaborative governance: an analysis of the effect of South Carolina’s Office of Regulatory Staff on public utility regulation. 18 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 219-268 (2011).
ENERGY POLICY.
Spence, David B. Regulation, “republican moments,” and energy policy reform. 2011 BYU L. Rev. 1561-1623
Symposium: Critical Intersections for Energy & Water Law: Exploring New Challenges and Opportunities. Foreword by Alastair R. Lucas, Gregory S. Weber and Patricia K. Wouters; articles by Alex Grzybowski, Stephen C. McCaffrey, Richard K. Paisley, Allan Ingelson, Lincoln Mitchell, Sean Assie, Alistair Rieu-Clarke, Geoffrey Gooch, Robin Kundis Craig, Steven Weissman, Lindsay Miller, David Aladjem and Kathleen Callison. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 135-321 (2010).
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE.
Environmental Law and Justice Symposium: New Directions in Environmental Law and Justice. Introduction by Randall S. Abate, Robert H. Abrams and Richard Gragg; keynote addresses by Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming and Beverly Wright; articles by Jaclyn Lopez, Elizabeth Ann Kronk, Nicole de Paula Domingos, Cathryn Henn and Alexandra Ritucci-Chinni, book review by Michael Lewyn; note by Tina M. Smith. 6 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 185-383 (2011).
Yacovone, Krista. Note. Brownfields and the poor: is cleanup a hazardous waste of time? An analysis of the United States’ efforts at remediation and their applicability to Brazil. 35 Fordham Int’l L.J. 201-247 (2011).
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
Recent developments. In the Congress. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10089-10092 (2012).
Recent development. In the Congress. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11157-11160 (2011).
Recent developments. In the courts. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10092-10093 (2012).
Recent development. In the courts. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11160-11161 (2011).
Recent developments. In the federal agencies. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10094-10096 (2012).
Recent development. In the federal agencies. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11162-11166 (2011).
Recent developments. In the state agencies. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10097-10101 (2012).
Recent development. In the state agencies. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11166-11169 (2011).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
Heinzerling, Lisa. Climate change at EPA. 64 Fla. L. Rev. 1-13 (2012).
Kerret, Dorit. Don’t judge a book by its cover: use of an analytic framework and empirical data in analyzing environmental policy tools. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10078-10088 (2012).
FISHERIES.
Amendola, Nathaniel H. Note. Let my people go fishing: apply the law of “givings” to private fishing preserves, exclusive fishing rights, and state-stocked rivers. 62 Syracuse L. Rev. 117-144 (2012).
GENETIC MODIFICATION.
Hausman, Nate. Student article. Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms: breathing a sigh of equitable relief. (Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 130 S. Ct. 2743, 2010.) 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 155-206 (2011).
GLOBAL WARMING.
Holing, Mary. Student article. It’s a question of proportionality: Proposition 26’s impacts on funding for the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. 18 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 39-59 (2012).
GREENHOUSE GASES.
DeAngelis, Kate. Comment. Black carbon: the most important ignored contributor to climate change. 26 Md. J. Int’l L. 239-270 (2011).
Hoffman, Nadine R. The emergence of carbon sequestration: an introduction and annotated bibliography of legal aspects of CCS. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 218-256 (2011).
Mathews, Madeline. Note. Carbon sequestration and pore space ownership in Texas. 41 Tex. Envtl. L.J. 205-223 (2011).
Mounteer, Tom. Obama Administration efforts to control stationary source greenhouse gas emissions through rulemaking. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11127-11145 (2011).
Murdock, Russell W. Note. The state of CO2 sequestration in the State of Texas. 41 Tex. Envtl. L.J. 65-81 (2010).
HERITAGE SITES.
Keough, Elizabeth Betsy. Note. Heritage in peril: a critique of UNESCO’s World Heritage program. 10 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 563-615 (2011).
Litton, Sam. Note. The World Heritage “In Danger” Listing as a taking. 44 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 219-265 (2011).
HUDSON RIVER.
Runnels, Michael B. and Andrea Giampetro-Meyer. Cooperative NRDA & new governance: getting to restoration in the Hudson River, the Gulf of Mexico, and beyond. 77 Brook. L. Rev. 107-149 (2011).
INSURANCE LAW.
Billah, Muhammad Masum. The role of insurance in providing adequate compensation and in reducing pollution incidents: the case of the international oil pollution liability regime. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 42-78 (2011).
INTERNATIONAL LAW.
Baez, Stephanie. Note. The “right” REDD framework: national laws that best protect indigenous rights in a global REDD regime. 80 Fordham L. Rev. 821-875 (2011).
Billah, Muhammad Masum. The role of insurance in providing adequate compensation and in reducing pollution incidents: the case of the international oil pollution liability regime. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 42-78 (2011).
Rutledge, Jessica L. Comment. Wait a second—is that rain or herbicide? The ICJ’s potential analysis in Aerial Herbicide Spraying and an epic choice between the environment and human rights. 46 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1079-1112 (2011).
INTERNATIONAL TRADE.
Benoit, Charles. Note. Picking tariff winners: non-product related PPMs and DSB interpretations of “unconditionally” within Article I.1. 42 Geo. J. Int’l L. 583-604 (2011).
Gu, Bin. Mineral export restraints and sustainable development—are rare earths testing the WTO’s loopholes? 14 J. Int’l Econ. L. 765-805 (2011).
Hull, Eric V. Poisoning the poor for profit: the injustice of exporting electronic waste to developing countries. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 1-47 (2010).
ISRAEL.
Stein, Jeffrey D. Note. Waging waterfare: Israel, Palestinians, and the need for a new hydro-logic to govern water rights under occupation. 44 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 165-217 (2011).
JURISDICTION.
Fischman, Allison. Case comment. Preserving legal avenues for climate justice in Florida post-American Electric Power. (American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut (AEP), 131 S. Ct. 2527, 2011.) 64 Fla. L. Rev. 295-304 (2012).
LAND USE.
Brunner, Scott W. Comment. Sharing the green: reformatting Wisconsin’s forgotten green space grant with a public-private partnership design. 95 Marq. L. Rev. 305-357 (2011).
Chrostek, Garrett. Note. A critique of Vermont’s right-to-farm law and proposals for better protecting the state’s agricultural future. 36 Vt. L. Rev. 233-259 (2011).
Pounds, Erin. Comment. State trust lands: static management and shifting value perspectives. 41 Envtl. L. 1333-1362 (2011).
LEGAL PROCESS.
Hausman, Nate. Student article. Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms: breathing a sigh of equitable relief. (Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 130 S. Ct. 2743, 2010.) 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 155-206 (2011).
Mank, Bradford C. Reading the standing tea leaves in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut. 46 U. Rich. L. Rev. 543-602 (2012).
MARINE RESOURCES.
Smith, Tina M. Note. Wildlife protection and off-shore drilling: can there be a balance between the two? 6 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 349-383 (2011).
MARITIME LAW.
Bush, Brittan J. Comment. The answer lies in admiralty: justifying oil spill punitive damages recovery through admiralty law. 41 Envtl. L. 1255-1294 (2011).
Ritucci-Chinni, Alexandra. The need for Congress to get onboard with cruise ship pollution regulation: how the lack of federal regulation of the cruise ship industry is destroying the nation’s waters. 6 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 313-348 (2011).
NAFTA.
Gantz, David A. Labor rights and environmental protection under NAFTA and other U.S. free trade agreements. 42 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 297-356 (2011).
NATIVE AMERICAN LANDS.
Kloeckner, Jane. Hold on to that tribal sovereignty: establishing tribal pesticide programs that recognize inherent tribal authority and promote federal-tribal partnerships. 42 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 10057-10077 (2012).
Sproat, D. Kapua‘ala. Wai through kānāwai: water for Hawai‘i’s streams and justice for Hawaiian communities. 95 Marq. L. Rev. 127-211 (2011).
NATURAL GAS.
Brown, Holli. Student article. The attack on frack: New York’s moratorium on hydraulic fracturing and where it stands in the threat of takings. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11146-11156 (2011).
Turgeon, Elizabeth. Recent development. “Goin’ to Carolina in my mind:” prospects and perils for natural gas drilling in North Carolina. 13 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 147-181 (2011).
Willie, Matt. Comment. Hydraulic fracturing and “spotty” regulation: why the Federal Government should let states control unconventional onshore drilling. 2011 BYU L. Rev. 1743-1781.
NATURAL RESOURCES.
Hoffman, Hillary M. Signs, signs, everywhere signs: The Wilderness Society v. Kane County leaves everyone confused about navigating a right-of-way claim under Revised Statute 2477. 18 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 3-35 (2012).
NEPA.
Kalen, Sam. Ecology comes of age: NEPA’s lost mandate. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 113-163 (2010).
NONINDIGENOUS SPECIES.
Graham, Jane Cynthia. Snakes on a plain, or in a wetland: fighting back invasive nonnative animals—proposing a federal comprehensive nonnative animal species statute. 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 19-81 (2011).
OCEANS.
Harse, Grant A. Plastic, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, and international misfires at a cure. 29 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 331-363 (2011).
OIL.
Orth, Derek. Comment. Administering America’s offshore oil fields: how fewer, performance-based regulations can produce better results. 26 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 509-534 (2011).
Veron, J. Michael. Oilfield contamination litigation in Louisiana: property rights on trial. 25 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 1-18 (2011).
OIL SPILLS.
Bush, Brittan J. Comment. Addressing the regulatory collapse behind the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: implementing a “best available technology” regulatory regime for deepwater oil exploration safety and cleanup technology. 26 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 535-569 (2011).
Costonis, John G. The Macondo well blowout: taking the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act seriously. 42 J. Mar. L. & Com. 511-568 (2011).
Davis, Andrew B. Note. Pure economic loss claims under the Oil Pollution Act: combining policy and congressional intent. 45 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 1-44 (2011).
Lopez, Jaclyn. Too much oil for the rubber-stamp: the government’s role in the BP oil spill. 6 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 201-214 (2011).
Pappas, Fay. Note. Gulf Coast blowout: how the BP oil spill is corroding communities and what attorneys & policymakers must do to stop it. 22 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 229-254 (2011).
Queale, Abby J. Student article. Responding to the response: reforming the legal framework for dispersant use in oil spill response efforts in the wake of Deepwater Horizon. 18 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 63-92 (2012).
Sole, Shannon L. Note. BP’s compensation fund: a buoy for both claimants and BP. 37 J. Corp. L. 245-263 (2011).
PETROLEUM INDUSTRY.
Vanham, Riley W. Comment. A shift in power: why increased urban drilling necessitates a change in regulatory authority. 43 St. Mary’s L.J. 229-287 (2011).
RECYCLING.
Fehm, Sarah. Note. From i-Pod to e-waste: building a successful framework for extended producer responsibility in the United States. 41 Pub. Cont. L.J. 173-192 (2011).
RELIGION.
Nelson, Robert H. Rethinking church and state: the case of environmental religion. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 121-217 (2011).
RENEWABLE ENERGY.
McDonnell, Matthew, Kirsten Engel and Ardeth Barnhart. The potential and power of renewable energy credits to enhance air quality and economic development in Arizona. 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 809-834 (2011).
Zeller-Powell, Christine Elizabeth. Defining biomass as a source of renewable energy: the life cycle carbon emissions of biomass energy and a survey and analysis of biomass definitions in states’ renewable portfolio standards, federal law, and proposed legislation. 26 J. Envtl. L. & Litig. 367-434 (2011).
SHALE.
Argetsinger, Beren. Comment. The Marcellus Shale: bridge to a clean energy future or bridge to nowhere? Environmental, energy and climate policy considerations for shale gas development in New York State. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 321-343 (2011).
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Farber, Daniel. Seventeenth Annual Lloyd K. Garrison Lecture. Sustainable consumption and communities: bringing the American way of life into the twenty-first century. 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 344-361 (2011).
TAKINGS.
Lopez, Alberto B. Kelo-style failings. 72 Ohio St. L.J. 777-820 (2011).
Peñalver, Eduardo M. and Lior Jacob Strahilevitz. Judicial takings or due process? 97 Cornell L. Rev. 305-368 (2012).
Peterson, Megan S. Comment. Condemnation blight: the need for adoption in Louisiana. 57 Loy. L. Rev. 299-374 (2011).
Spencer, Peter. Note. When giving almost becomes a taking: an analysis of ... (Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 129 S. Ct. 2792, 2009.) 16 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 751-796 (2011).
Sprankling, Thomas G. Note. Does five equal three? Reading the Takings Clause in light of the Third Amendment’s protection of houses. 112 Colum. L. Rev. 112-151 (2012).
TAXATION.
Lowe, Sean. Comment. A way through the impasse in U.S. climate change legislation: a GHG tax that possesses political and administrative feasibility and conforms to international law. 29 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 435-470 (2011).
TECHNOLOGY.
Green Technology and Economic Revitalization in Michigan Symposium. Articles by Thomas P. Lyon, Russell A. Baruffi, Jr. and Stanley “Skip” Pruss. 18 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 303-365 (2011).
Hickey, Jay. Note. Green technology: an alternative path to accelerated patent examination. 62 Syracuse L. Rev. 145-165 (2012).
Jaffe, Seth. Comment. Manufacturing a system of remanufacturing: how the Patent Office can facilitate environmentally conscious product design. 48 Hous. L. Rev. 919-957 (2011).
Pruss, Stanley “Skip”. The case for clean energy technology manufacturing: ten steps business and industry must take to optimize opportunities in the emerging clean energy economy. 18 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 349-365 (2011).
Smith, Van. Note. Enabling environments or enabling discord: intellectual property rights, public-private partnerships, and the quest for green technology transfer. 42 Geo. J. Int’l L. 817-854 (2011).
TORTS.
Latham, Mark, Victor E. Schwartz and Christopher E. Appel. The intersection of tort and environmental law: where the twains should meet and depart. 80 Fordham L. Rev. 737-773 (2011).
TOXICS.
Pratt, Laura A.W. Decreasing dirty dumping? A reevaluation of toxic waste colonialism and the global management of transboundary hazardous waste. 41 Tex. Envtl. L.J. 147-180 (2011).
TSCA Reform: The Standard of Safety. Linda Breggin, moderator; James V. Aidala, Wendy Cleland-Hamnett and Richard Denison, panelists. 41 Envtl. L. Rep. News & Analysis 11081-11090 (2011).
TRANSNATIONAL WATERWAYS.
Ingelson, Allan, Lincoln Mitchell and Sean Assie. Coal and coalbed methane development in the Flathead—an international water dispute. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 155-191 (2010).
WATER LAW.
Andrew, Nicholas. Note. Interstate water transfers and the Red River shootout. 41 Tex. Envtl. L.J. 181-203 (2011).
Changing Conceptions of Water in the Law. Introduction by Kali Murray; articles by David A. Myers, Barton H. Thompson, Jr., Joseph W. Dellapenna, Shelley Ross Saxer, D. Kapua‘ala Sproat and Asmara M. Tekle. 95 Marq. L. Rev. 1-243 (2011).
Dellapenna, Joseph W. The evolution of riparianism in the United States. 95 Marq. L. Rev. 53-90 (2011).
Losi, Christopher J. Student article. Keeping dry streams green: can landowners in Arizona and California use property rights to maintain groundwater-dependent riparian habitat along non-perennial watercourses? 18 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 121-153 (2012).
Saxer, Shelley Ross. The fluid nature of property rights in water. 21 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol’y F. 49-112 (2010).
Saxer, Shelley Ross. Managing water rights using fishing rights as a model. 95 Marq. L. Rev. 91-126 (2011).
Shelley, Adrian. Note. Fair, effective, and comprehensive: the future of Texas water law. 41 Tex. Envtl. L.J. 47-64 (2010).
WATER POLLUTION.
Henn, Cathryn. Enemy of the People: the need for Congress to pass the Clean Water Restoration Act. 6 Fla. A&M U. L. Rev. 257-297 (2011).
Kalisek, Lauren. The principle of antidegradation and its place in Texas water quality permitting. 41 Tex. Envtl. L.J. 1-27 (2010).
Leitman, Melanie. Comment. Water Rx. The problem of pharmaceuticals in our nation’s waters. 29 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 395-433 (2011).
WATER RESOURCES.
Benson, Reed D. Environmental review of Western water project operations: where NEPA has not applied, will it now protect farmers from fish? 29 UCLA J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 269-330 (2011).
Craig, Robin Kundis. Water supply, desalination, climate change, and energy policy. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 225-255 (2010).
Davis, Mark and James Wilkins. A defining resource: Louisiana’s place in the emerging water economy. 57 Loy. L. Rev. 273-298 (2011).
Larson, Elise L. Note. In deep water: a common law solution to the bulk water export problem. 96 Minn. L. Rev. 739-767 (2011).
Link, Adam D. Comment. The perils of privatization: international developments and reform in water distribution. 22 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 379-399 (2010).
Stanton, Marcia Silva. Payments for freshwater ecosystem services: a framework for analysis. 18 Hastings W.-Nw. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 189-290 (2012).
Tekle, Asmara M. Lawns and the new watershed law. 95 Marq. L. Rev. 213-243 (2011).
Thompson, Barton H., Jr. Water as a public commodity. 95 Marq. L. Rev. 17-52 (2011).
ZONING.
Addes, Kirah. Note. The fate of affordable housing legislation in New Jersey: how Governor Christie’s proposed S-1 legislation threatens to undo the New Jersey Supreme Court decisions in Mount Laurel I and Mount Laurel II. (Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (Mount Laurel I), 336 A.2d 713, 1975; Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (Mount Laurel II), 456 A.2d 390, 1983.) 36 Seton Hall Legis. J. 82-105 (2011).
No comments:
Post a Comment